ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology2013
Variation in dermatologist beliefs about the safety and effectiveness of treatments for moderate to severe psoriasis.
Article in Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging the Gaps in the Care of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis: the Role of Combined Clinics.Current rheumatology reports · 2018Review
- National Psoriasis Foundation Priorities for Patient-Centered Research: Proceedings from the 2016 Conference.Journal of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMultiple systemic treatments are available for moderate to severe psoriasis, but dermatologists' perceptions of these treatments are unknown. Physician perceptions can influence prescribing patterns and patient outcomes, and may help to explain variations in clinical practice.
objectiveWe sought to describe the variation in dermatologist's beliefs about the safety and effectiveness of psoriasis treatments and evaluate how these relate to dermatologist characteristics and treatment preferences.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional mail survey of a random sample of 500 National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) members and 500 American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) members who treat psoriasis.
resultsOf 989 clinicians who could be contacted, 246 NPF members and 141 AAD members returned the survey (39% response rate). Respondents perceived infliximab, ustekinumab, cyclosporine, and adalimumab to have the highest likelihood of skin clearance in 3 months (67%-75%). Etanercept, adalimumab, ultraviolet B, and ustekinumab had the lowest perceived likelihood of side effects requiring treatment discontinuation (9%-11%). Up to 49% of respondents "didn't know" the effectiveness or likelihood of side effects; calculated coefficients of variation were higher for perceived likelihood of side effects than perceived effectiveness. There were few significant associations between safety and effectiveness perceptions and respondent characteristics, and treatment preferences were not consistently predictive of perceptions. LIMITATIONS: Only dermatologists with interest in treating psoriasis were surveyed and general perceptions were elicited via survey format. Perceptions may differ between survey respondents and nonrespondents.
conclusionsPsoriasis providers demonstrate wide variation in their perception of the effectiveness and especially safety of systemic treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.