Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22909147›Full record

Trial reportClinical drug investigation2012

Efficacy and safety of triple antihypertensive therapy with the olmesartan/amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide combination.

Massimo Volpe, Lars Christian Rump, Bettina Ammentorp, Petra Laeis

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00923091 (Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Co-Administration of Triple Combinations of Olmesartan Medoxomil, Amlodipine Besylate, and Hydrochlorothiazide Compared With Corresponding Olmesartan - Amlodipine Combination in Subjects With Hypertension), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00923091 phase3completednot on this map

Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Co-Administration of Triple Combinations of Olmesartan Medoxomil, Amlodipine Besylate, and Hydrochlorothiazide Compared With Corresponding Olmesartan - Amlodipine Combination in Subjects With Hypertension

TypeinterventionalSponsorDaiichi SankyoRan2009 to 2011Enrolled2,689ConditionsEssential HypertensionArmsolmesartan medoxomil + amlodipine + hydroclororthiazide + placebo, Olmesartan medoxomil + amlodipine + hydrochlorothiazide + placebo, olmesartan medoxomil + amlodipine + hydroclororthiazide, olmesartan medoxomil + amlodipine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Personalised Single-Pill Combination Therapy in Hypertensive Patients: An Update of a Practical Treatment Platform.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2017
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Single-Pill Combination with Three Antihypertensive Agents to Improve Blood Pressure Control in Hypertension: Focus on Olmesartan-Based Combinations.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. [Austrian Consensus on High Blood Pressure 2019].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Educational Interventions May Promote Better Blood Pressure Control in Russia.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2017
    Article
  14. Triple Combination Therapies Based on Olmesartan: A Personalized Therapeutic Approach to Improve Blood Pressure Control.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2017
    Review
  15. Achieving Goal Blood Pressure.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2015
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Massimo VolpeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, University of Rome La Sapienza, Sant' Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Lars Christian Rump
Bettina Ammentorp
Petra Laeis
Daiichi Sankyo (Germany) · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEIstituto Neurologico Mediterraneo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEuropean hypertension guidelines estimate that up to 15-20% of hypertensive patients are not controlled on a dual antihypertensive combination and require three or more different antihypertensive drug classes to achieve blood pressure (BP) control.

objectiveThis study in patients with moderate-to-severe hypertension assessed the efficacy and safety of adding hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg and 25 mg to a range of olmesartan medoxomil (OLM)/amlodipine (AML) doses. STUDY

designThis phase III, multicentre study had a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group design that included a double-blind safety run-in and a double-blind treatment period.

interventionEnrolled patients were screened and previous therapy was discontinued if required. During a 2-week, double-blind, safety run-in period (Weeks 0-2), patients were randomized to receive placebo, OLM/AML 20 mg/5 mg, OLM/AML 40 mg/5 mg or OLM/AML 40 mg/10 mg. During an 8-week, double-blind treatment period (Weeks 3-10), patients were allocated to eight groups depending on their initial treatment. They were either randomized to continue with the same dose of OLM/AML, or have HCTZ 12.5 mg or 25 mg added to treatment.

main outcome measureThe primary endpoint was formulated before data collection began. It was the change in mean diastolic BP (DBP) from baseline to Week 10 in groups with HCTZ added to OLM/AML, compared with the corresponding dual OLM/AML therapy.

resultsOf 3195 patients who were screened, 2690 were randomized. Patients in every triple OLM/AML/HCTZ group had significantly greater mean reductions in DBP (p ≤ 0.032 for each comparison) and systolic BP (SBP) by Week 10 (p ≤ 0.0034 for each comparison), compared with patients on the corresponding OLM/AML therapy dose. The significant improvements in DBP and SBP reduction with triple OLM/AML/HCTZ therapy, compared with dual OLM/AML therapy, were observed after 4 and 6 weeks of therapy. Patients in each triple therapy group also had a significantly higher rate of BP <140/90 mmHg threshold achievement (p ≤ 0.05 for each treatment comparison), compared with the dual OLM/AML groups. In three of the OLM/AML/HCTZ groups (40 mg/5 mg/25 mg, 40 mg/10 mg/12.5 mg and 40 mg/10 mg/25 mg), BP <140/90 mmHg threshold achievement by Week 10 was over 70%. Across the triple and dual combination therapy groups, treatment was well tolerated and no safety concerns for either treatment were identified.

conclusionAdding HCTZ to a range of OLM/AML dose combinations is well tolerated and improved BP control by significantly lowering DBP and SBP and significantly increasing BP threshold achievement in patients with moderate-to-severe hypertension. CLINICAL

trial registrationRegistered at ClinicalTrials.gov identifier as NCT00923091.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAgingAmlodipineAntihypertensive AgentsDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationEndpoint DeterminationFemaleHumansHydrochlorothiazideHypertensionImidazolesMaleMiddle AgedTetrazolesAmlodipineAntihypertensive AgentsHydrochlorothiazideImidazolesolmesartanTetrazoles

Identifiers

PMID22909147
OpenAlexW2016750907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.