ArticleBMC genomics2012
Personal receptor repertoires: olfaction as a model.
Article in BMC genomics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.
- A clinical and mechanistic study on traditional Chinese medicine herbs used in olfactory training.Chinese medicine · 2026Article
- New insights into the docking mechanism of vanillin on three mammalian olfactory receptors via a new statistical physics model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Life history and chromosome organization determine chemoreceptor gene expression in rattlesnakes.The Journal of heredity · 2025Article
- Wider Than the Sky: An Alternative to "Mapping" the World Onto the Brain.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- An odorant receptor for a key odor constituent of ambergris.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Adaptive genomic signatures of globally invasive populations of the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025Article
- Natural selection and adaptive traits in the Maniq, a nomadic hunter-gatherer society from Mainland Southeast Asia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Odors as cognitive constructs: history of odor classification and attempts to map odor percepts to physical and chemical parameters.Chemical senses · 2025Review
- Diversity in chemosensory receptor genes in dogs and wolves: degeneration of the olfactory receptor gene repertoire in the brachycephalic Pug.Chemical senses · 2025Article
- Olfactory Receptors and Aortic Aneurysm: Review of Disease Pathways.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Draft Genome of Akame (Lates Japonicus) Reveals Possible Genetic Mechanisms for Long-Term Persistence and Adaptive Evolution with Low Genetic Diversity.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- M2OR: a database of olfactory receptor-odorant pairs for understanding the molecular mechanisms of olfaction.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Human subsistence and signatures of selection on chemosensory genes.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Modeling the Orthosteric Binding Site of the G Protein-Coupled Odorant Receptor OR5K1.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023Article
- The human odorant receptor OR10A6 is tuned to the pheromone of the commensal fruit flyiScience · 2022Article
- From musk to body odor: Decoding olfaction through genetic variation.PLoS genetics · 2022Article
- African Gene Flow Reduces Beta-Ionone Anosmia/Hyposmia Prevalence in Admixed Malagasy Populations.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- What Is the Relationship between the Presence of Volatile Organic Compounds in Food and Drink Products and Multisensory Flavour Perception?Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- The Olfactory System as Marker of Neurodegeneration in Aging, Neurological and Neuropsychiatric Disorders.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- An evolutionary conserved olfactory receptor for foodborne and semiochemical alkylpyrazines.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInformation on nucleotide diversity along completely sequenced human genomes has increased tremendously over the last few years. This makes it possible to reassess the diversity status of distinct receptor proteins in different human individuals. To this end, we focused on the complete inventory of human olfactory receptor coding regions as a model for personal receptor repertoires.
resultsBy performing data-mining from public and private sources we scored genetic variations in 413 intact OR loci, for which one or more individuals had an intact open reading frame. Using 1000 Genomes Project haplotypes, we identified a total of 4069 full-length polypeptide variants encoded by these OR loci, average of ~10 per locus, constituting a lower limit for the effective human OR repertoire. Each individual is found to harbor as many as 600 OR allelic variants, ~50% higher than the locus count. Because OR neuronal expression is allelically excluded, this has direct effect on smell perception diversity of the species. We further identified 244 OR segregating pseudogenes (SPGs), loci showing both intact and pseudogene forms in the population, twenty-six of which are annotatively "resurrected" from a pseudogene status in the reference genome. Using a custom SNP microarray we validated 150 SPGs in a cohort of 468 individuals, with every individual genome averaging 36 disrupted sequence variations, 15 in homozygote form. Finally, we generated a multi-source compendium of 63 OR loci harboring deletion Copy Number Variations (CNVs). Our combined data suggest that 271 of the 413 intact OR loci (66%) are affected by nonfunctional SNPs/indels and/or CNVs.
conclusionsThese results portray a case of unusually high genetic diversity, and suggest that individual humans have a highly personalized inventory of functional olfactory receptors, a conclusion that might apply to other receptor multigene families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.