Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22908109›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2012

One-year outcomes of prenatal exposure to MDMA and other recreational drugs.

Lynn T Singer, Derek G Moore, Meeyoung O Min, Julia Goodwin, John J D Turner, Sarah Fulton, Andrew C Parrott

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Psychostimulants and movement disorders.Frontiers in neurology · 2015
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lynn T SingerDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA. lynn.singer@case.edu
Derek G Moore
Meeyoung O Min
Julia Goodwin
John J D Turner
Sarah Fulton
Andrew C Parrott

Funding

Developmental Outcomes of Prenatal Exposure to MDMA ('E*R01DA014910 · NIDA · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI SINGER, LYNN T · 2001 to 2005
$2.8M
NIDA NIH HHS DA14910-05NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA014910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA widely used illicit recreational drug among young adults, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) or ecstasy, is an indirect monoaminergic agonist/reuptake inhibitor affecting the serotonin system. Preclinical studies found prenatal exposure related to long-term learning and memory impairments. There are no studies of sequelae of prenatal MDMA exposure in humans, despite potential harmful effects to the fetus.

methodsA total of 96 women in the United Kingdom (28 MDMA users; 68 non-MDMA) were interviewed about recreational drug use during pregnancy. Their infants were seen at 12 months using standardized assessments of cognitive, language, and motor development (Preschool Language Scale, Bayley Mental and Motor Development and Behavior Rating Scales [Mental Development Index, Psychomotor Development Index, Behavioral Rating Scale]). Mothers completed the Child Domain Scale of the Parenting Stress Index, The Home Observation of the Environment Scale (in interview), the Brief Symptom Inventory, and the Drug Abuse Screening Test. Women were primarily middle class with some university education, in stable partner relationships, and polydrug users. MDMA and other drug effects were assessed through multiple regression analyses controlling for confounding variables, and analysis of covariance comparing heavier versus lighter and nonexposed groups.

resultsAmount of prenatal MDMA exposure predicted poorer infant mental and motor development at 12 months in a dose-dependent manner. Heavily exposed infants were delayed in motor development. Lighter-exposed infants were comparable to nonexposed infants. There were no effects on language, emotional regulation, or parenting stress.

conclusionsFindings document persistent neurotoxic effects of heavier prenatal MDMA exposure on motor development through the first year of life.

Indexed as

Prenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsCognitionDevelopmental DisabilitiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHallucinogensHumansInfantMaleN-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetaminePregnancyPsychomotor PerformanceSocioeconomic FactorsHallucinogensN-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine

Identifiers

PMID22908109
PMCPMC3428761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.