Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22907806›Full record

ArticleHead & neck2013

Effect of erlotinib on epidermal growth factor receptor and downstream signaling in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.

Christina I Tsien, Mukesh K Nyati, Aarif Ahsan, Susmita G Ramanand, Douglas B Chepeha, Francis P Worden, Joseph I Helman, Nisha D'Silva, Carol R Bradford, Gregory T Wolf and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Head & neck, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Inhibition of the LINE1-derivedMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025
    Article
  7. The Splicing Factor PTBP1 RepressesCancer research communications · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Recent Advances in Nanoscale Metal-Organic Frameworks Towards Cancer Cell Cytotoxicity: An Overview.Journal of inorganic and organometallic polymers and materials · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Curcumin inhibits oral squamous cell carcinoma proliferation and invasion via EGFR signaling pathways.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christina I TsienDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA. ctsien@umich.edu
Mukesh K Nyati
Aarif Ahsan
Susmita G Ramanand
Douglas B Chepeha
Francis P Worden
Joseph I Helman
Nisha D'Silva
Carol R Bradford
Gregory T Wolf
Theodore S Lawrence
Avraham Eisbruch
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USMichigan Medicine · US

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI THEODORE S LAWRENCE · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
Therapeutic Potential and Mechanism of Action of Potent Small Molecule InhibitorsP50CA097248 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WOLF, GREGORY T · 2002 to 2013
$25.3M
Integration of EGFR Inhibitors with Radiochemotherapy in Head and Neck CancerR01CA131290 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI NYATI, MUKESH K. · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592NCI NIH HHS P50 CA097248NCI NIH HHS R01 CA131290
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to determine if there are differences in biomarker modulation and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) degradation between the tumor and the normal mucosa after treatment with an EGFR inhibitor, erlotinib, in head and neck cancer.

methodsPatients with primary oral cavity squamous cell cancers received a course of erlotinib, 150 mg every day for 7 days before surgical resection. Tumor and normal mucosa biopsies were obtained both pre-erlotinib and post-erlotinib. Changes in known markers of EGFR activity (phospho, AKT, STAT3) were measured by immunoblotting, whereas changes in tissue distribution were analyzed by immunohistochemical analysis.

resultsTwelve patients were enrolled; 7 had evaluable paired tumors and normal mucosa biopsies pretreatment and posttreatment. Expression of EGFR was higher in tumors compared to the normal mucosa (p = .005). Erlotinib administration was associated with marked inhibition of phosphorylated epidermal growth factor receptor (pEGFR) and reduction in total EGFR protein (p = .004, p = .007) in tumors, whereas there was heterogeneity in EGFR inhibition in the normal mucosa (p = .10 [pEGFR], and p = .07 [EGFR]). Reduced levels of pSrc and pSTAT3 and enhanced p27 levels were noted in tumors after erlotinib. Cell culture studies confirmed that EGFR is degraded in tumor cells after prolonged treatment with erlotinib.

conclusionOur results show that EGFR inhibition by erlotinib led to a marked reduction in EGFR protein levels in patients. Differential effects of erlotinib on tumors compared to the normal mucosa suggest there may be individual patient heterogeneity. These preliminary data suggest EGFR degradation should be further analyzed as a potential biomarker in selecting patients likely to benefit from EGFR inhibitors.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCarcinoma, Squamous CellCell Culture TechniquesChildChild, PreschoolErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansImmunoblottingImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedMouth MucosaErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktQuinazolinesSTAT3 protein, humanSTAT3 Transcription Factorbiomarkerdegradationerlotinibnormal mucosaprimary oral cavity cancer

Identifiers

PMID22907806
PMCPMC4364542
OpenAlexW2120992361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.