Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22907550›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2012

The potential contribution of community health workers to improving health outcomes in UK primary care.

Matthew J Harris, Andy Haines

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Community health workers in Canada and other high-income countries: A scoping review and research gaps.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Health policy reviews in the JRSM.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2012
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matthew J HarrisDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, London W6 8RP, UK. m.harris@imperial.ac.uk
Andy Haines

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareCommunity Health ServicesCommunity Health WorkersFemaleHealth StatusHumansInterprofessional RelationsMaleNational Health ProgramsPrimary Health CareUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID22907550
PMCPMC3423132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.