Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22907520›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2012

[Extracorporeal lung support].

M Hecker, D Bandorski, A Hecker

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. [Pulmonary embolism].Der Anaesthesist · 2017
    Article
  3. Article
  4. [Pulmonary embolism].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M HeckerMedizinische Klinik II (Pneumologie/internistische Intensivmedizin), Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg, Standort Gießen, Klinikstraße 33, 35392, Gießen, Deutschland. matthias.hecker@innere.med.uni-giessen.de
D Bandorski
A Hecker
Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For decades, techniques for extracorporeal lung support, such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), have offered in specialized centres the possibility to completely or partly substitute lung function, thus, facilitating healing. Initially the application of ECMO was associated with severe complications, but significant technical progress in recent years has led to the development of safer systems and promotes a wider distribution of the technique. Supported by recent, positive study data, ECMO has become a promising option for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) therapy in specialized centers. Further developments and modifications, such as pumpless devices for extracorporeal lung support have the potential of becoming an interesting option for intensive care medicine - however, data of prospective studies showing efficacy are still not available.

Indexed as

Oxygenators, MembraneContraindicationsEquipment DesignExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHemofiltrationHumansIntensive Care UnitsProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress SyndromeRespiratory InsufficiencyRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID22907520
OpenAlexW2400798091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.