ReviewNature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology2012
Interval cancers after colonoscopy-insights and recommendations.
Review in Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Endoscopic Hallmarks of Sessile Serrated Lesions: A Systematic Review of an Evolving Concept.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- Post-Colonoscopy Complications: A Systematic Review, Time Trends, and Meta-Analysis of Population-Based Studies.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2016Pooled it
- Article
- Association between Endoscopist Volume and Interval Cancers after Colonoscopy: Results from the National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Korea.Cancer research and treatment · 2024Article
- Near-Infrared Imaging of Colonic Adenomas In Vivo Using Orthotopic Human Organoids for Early Cancer Detection.Cancers · 2023Article
- Predictors for malignant potential and deep submucosal invasion in colorectal laterally spreading tumors.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022Article
- Regional variations and associations between colonoscopy resource availability and colonoscopy utilisation: a population-based descriptive study in Ontario, Canada.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2022Article
- The Incidence, Distribution and Clinicopathology of Missed Colorectal Cancer After Diagnostic Colonoscopy.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2021Article
- IgM and IgA augmented autoantibody signatures improve early-stage detection of colorectal cancer prior to nodal and distant spread.Clinical & translational immunology · 2021Article
- Article
- The Coexistence of Colorectal Polyps in the Right Colon Increases the Malignant Risk of Laterally Spreading Tumors.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2020Article
- Detection of colonic neoplasia in vivo using near-infrared-labeled peptide targeting cMet.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Lead Time Bias May Contribute to the Shorter Life Expectancy in Post-colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2019Article
- Periodontitis is associated with an increased risk for proximal colorectal neoplasms.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Clinicopathologic and genetic characteristics of interval colorectal carcinomas favor origin from missed or incompletely excised precursors.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2019Article
- Comparison of Small Versus Large Volume Split Dose Preparation for Colonoscopy: A Study of Colonoscopy Outcomes.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2018Article
- Article
- The incidence of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: a retrospective long-term cohort study using a colonoscopy database.International journal of colorectal disease · 2017Article
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several studies have raised warnings about the limited effectiveness of colonoscopy for the prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC), especially of the proximal colon. Two major categories of factors might be responsible for the development of interval cancers, namely technical, endoscopist-dependent factors and biological characteristics of the cancer that lead to more rapid tumour progression. Recognition of endoscopist-dependent factors is critical, as these factors are probably amenable to correction through improved awareness and education of endoscopists, using quality metrics (such as adenoma detection rates and cecal intubation rates) for objective evaluation and feedback. In this article, the current literature regarding the incidence of, and potential explanations for, interval CRCs is outlined. Although there is probably an interaction between technical and biology-related factors--and an attempt to dissect the biology from the technology might be fraught with difficulties--a structured analysis of individual cases of interval cancer might help in the continuous monitoring of the quality of colonoscopy, and ultimately might reduce the number of interval CRCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22907162What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.