Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22905113›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Identification of learning mechanisms in a wild meerkat population.

Will Hoppitt, Jamie Samson, Kevin N Laland, Alex Thornton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Individual variation in cognitive performance: developmental and evolutionary perspectives.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2012
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Social learning in otters.Royal Society open science · 2017
    Article
  9. Synchronized practice helps bearded capuchin monkeys learn to extend attention while learning a tradition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Tolerance and Social Facilitation in the Foraging Behaviour of Free-Ranging Crows (Ethology : formerly Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
  14. 'Captivity bias' in animal tool use and its implications for the evolution of hominin technology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Review
  15. Animal minds: from computation to evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Will HoppittCentre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, United Kingdom.
Jamie Samson
Kevin N Laland
Alex Thornton
University of St Andrews · GBKalahari Meerkat Project · ZAUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/C005430/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D015812/1European Research Council 232823
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vigorous debates as to the evolutionary origins of culture remain unresolved due to an absence of methods for identifying learning mechanisms in natural populations. While laboratory experiments on captive animals have revealed evidence for a number of mechanisms, these may not necessarily reflect the processes typically operating in nature. We developed a novel method that allows social and asocial learning mechanisms to be determined in animal groups from the patterns of interaction with, and solving of, a task. We deployed it to analyse learning in groups of wild meerkats (Suricata suricatta) presented with a novel foraging apparatus. We identify nine separate learning processes underlying the meerkats' foraging behaviour, in each case precisely quantifying their strength and duration, including local enhancement, emulation, and a hitherto unrecognized form of social learning, which we term 'observational perseverance'. Our analysis suggests a key factor underlying the stability of behavioural traditions is a high ratio of specific to generalized social learning effects. The approach has widespread potential as an ecologically valid tool to investigate learning mechanisms in natural groups of animals, including humans.

Indexed as

LearningAnimalsBehavior, AnimalFeeding BehaviorFemaleHerpestidaeMaleModels, TheoreticalProbabilityProblem SolvingSocial BehaviorStochastic Processes

Identifiers

PMID22905113
PMCPMC3414518
OpenAlexW2092830404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.