Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22905030›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2012

Psychosocial vulnerabilities to depression after acute coronary syndrome: the pivotal role of rumination in predicting and maintaining depression.

Ellen-Ge D Denton, Nina Rieckmann, Karina W Davidson, William F Chaplin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ellen-Ge D DentonDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center New York, NY, USA.
Nina Rieckmann
Karina W Davidson
William F Chaplin

Funding

Depression, Biobehavioral Mechanisms, & CHD/Mortality OutcomesP01HL088117 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DAVIDSON, KARINA W. · 2008 to 2013
$12.5M
MIND-BODY-BEHAVIORAL MED CLINICAL TRIALS INFRASTRUCTURER24HL076857 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GERIN, WILLIAM · 2004 to 2008
$3.5M
Controlled Randomized Anger Reduction in HypertensivesK23HL004458 · NHLBI · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI DAVIDSON, KARINA W. · 2001 to 2005
$644k
TRANSLATIONAL BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE RESEARCH CONSORTIA-N01HC25197N01HC025197 · HC · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · 2002 to 2005
–
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL004458NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC025197NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL088117NHLBI NIH HHS R24 HL076857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychosocial vulnerabilities may predispose individuals to develop depression after a significant life stressor, such as an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aims are (1) to examine the interrelations among vulnerabilities, and their relation with changes in depressive symptoms 3 months after ACS, (2) to prospectively assess whether rumination interacts with other vulnerabilities as a predictor of later depressive symptoms, and (3) to examine how these relations differ between post-ACS patients who meet diagnostic criteria for depression at baseline versus patients who do not. Within 1 week after hospitalization for ACS, and again after 3 months, 387 patients (41% female, 79.6% white, mean age 61) completed the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and measures of vulnerabilities (lack of pleasant events, dysfunctional attitudes, role transitions, poor dyadic adjustment). Exclusion criteria were a BDI score of 5-9, terminal illness, active substance abuse, cognitive impairment, and unavailability for follow-up visits. We used hierarchical regression modeling cross-sectionally and longitudinally. Controlling for baseline (in-hospital) depression and cardiovascular disease severity, vulnerabilities significantly predicted 3 month depression severity. Rumination independently predicted increased depression severity, above other vulnerabilities (β = 0.75, p < 0.001), and also interacted with poor dyadic adjustment (β = 0.32, p < 0.001) to amplify depression severity. Among initially non-depressed patients, the effects of vulnerabilities were amplified by rumination. In contrast, in patients who were already depressed at baseline, there was a direct effect of rumination above vulnerabilities on depression severity. Although all vulnerabilities predict depression 3 months after an ACS event has occurred rumination plays a key role to amplify the impact of vulnerabilities on depression among the initially non-depressed, and maintains depression among those who are already depressed.

Indexed as

cardiovascular diseasedepressionpost-ACSpsychosocial vulnerabilitiesrumination

Identifiers

PMID22905030
PMCPMC3417406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.