ArticleAn international journal on information fusion2012
Quantifying the Correctness, Computational Complexity, and Security of Privacy-Preserving String Comparators for Record Linkage.
Article in An international journal on information fusion, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel analysis methodology for assessment of re-identification risks for the National Cancer Institute cancer registry privacy preserving record linkage technique.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- Evaluating privacy-preserving record linkage using cryptographic long-term keys and multibit trees on large medical datasets.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2017Article
- Validity of a stroke severity index for administrative claims data research: a retrospective cohort study.BMC health services research · 2016Article
- Privacy preserving probabilistic record linkage (P3RL): a novel method for linking existing health-related data and maintaining participant confidentiality.BMC medical research methodology · 2015Article
- Composite Bloom Filters for Secure Record Linkage.IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering · 2014Article
- SOEMPI: A Secure Open Enterprise Master Patient Index Software Toolkit for Private Record Linkage.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2014Article
- Efficient Privacy-Aware Record Integration.Advances in database technology : proceedings. International Conference on Extending Database Technology · 2013Article
- A practical approach to achieve private medical record linkage in light of public resources.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAArticle
- Privacy preserving interactive record linkage (PPIRL).Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Record linkage is the task of identifying records from disparate data sources that refer to the same entity. It is an integral component of data processing in distributed settings, where the integration of information from multiple sources can prevent duplication and enrich overall data quality, thus enabling more detailed and correct analysis. Privacy-preserving record linkage (PPRL) is a variant of the task in which data owners wish to perform linkage without revealing identifiers associated with the records. This task is desirable in various domains, including healthcare, where it may not be possible to reveal patient identity due to confidentiality requirements, and in business, where it could be disadvantageous to divulge customers' identities. To perform PPRL, it is necessary to apply string comparators that function in the privacy-preserving space. A number of privacy-preserving string comparators (PPSCs) have been proposed, but little research has compared them in the context of a real record linkage application. This paper performs a principled and comprehensive evaluation of six PPSCs in terms of three key properties: 1) correctness of record linkage predictions, 2) computational complexity, and 3) security. We utilize a real publicly-available dataset, derived from the North Carolina voter registration database, to evaluate the tradeoffs between the aforementioned properties. Among our results, we find that PPSCs that partition, encode, and compare strings yield highly accurate record linkage results. However, as a tradeoff, we observe that such PPSCs are less secure than those that map and compare strings in a reduced dimensional space.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.