Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22904680›Full record

ArticleNeoplasia (New York, N.Y.)2012

The p53 codon 72 Pro/Pro genotype identifies poor-prognosis neuroblastoma patients: correlation with reduced apoptosis and enhanced senescence by the p53-72P isoform.

Sara Cattelani, Giovanna Ferrari-Amorotti, Sara Galavotti, Raffaella Defferrari, Barbara Tanno, Samantha Cialfi, Jenny Vergalli, Valentina Fragliasso, Clara Guerzoni, Gloria Manzotti and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bioscience reports · 2019
    Article
  6. Journal of Cancer · 2019
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. TheAging · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Rare variants in TP53 and susceptibility to neuroblastoma.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Association Between Arg72Pro Polymorphism inCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 12 institutions in 3 countries.

Sara CattelaniDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Giovanna Ferrari-Amorotti
Sara Galavotti
Raffaella Defferrari
Barbara Tanno
Samantha Cialfi
Jenny Vergalli
Valentina Fragliasso
Clara Guerzoni
Gloria Manzotti
Angela Rachele Soliera
Chiara Menin
Roberta Bertorelle
Heather P McDowell
Alessandro Inserra
Maria Luisa Belli
Luigi Varesio
Deborah Tweddle
Gian Paolo Tonini
Pierluigi Altavista
Carlo Dominici
Giuseppe Raschellà
Bruno Calabretta
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITNational Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITIstituto Giannina Gaslini · ITAlder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust · GBCRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence · GBIstituto Oncologico Veneto · ITIstituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITSidney Kimmel Cancer Center · USThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The p53 gene is rarely mutated in neuroblastoma, but codon 72 polymorphism that modulates its proapoptotic activity might influence cancer risk and clinical outcome. We investigated whether this polymorphism affects neuroblastoma risk and disease outcome and assessed the biologic effects of the p53-72R and p53-72P isoforms in p53-null cells. Comparison of 288 healthy subjects and 286 neuroblastoma patients revealed that the p53-72 polymorphism had no significant impact on the risk of developing neuroblastoma; however, patients with the Pro/Pro genotype had a shorter survival than those with the Arg/Arg or the Arg/Pro genotypes even in the stage 3 and 4 subgroup without MYCN amplification. By Cox regression analysis, the p53 Pro/Pro genotype seems to be an independent marker of poor prognosis (hazard ratio = 2.74; 95% confidence interval = 1.14-6.55, P = .014) together with clinical stage, MYCN status, and age at diagnosis. In vitro, p53-72P was less effective than p53-72R in inducing apoptosis and inhibiting survival of p53-null LAN-1 cells treated with etoposide, topotecan, or ionizing radiation but not taxol. By contrast, p53-72P was more effective in promoting p21-dependent accelerated senescence, alone or in the presence of etoposide. Thus, the p53-72 Pro/Pro genotype might be a marker of poor outcome independent of MYCN amplification, possibly improving risk stratification. Moreover, the lower apoptosis and the enhanced accelerated senescence by the p53-72P isoform in response to DNA damage suggest that patients with neuroblastoma with the p53-72 Pro/Pro genotype may benefit from therapeutic protocols that do not rely only on cytotoxic drugs that function, in part, through p53 activation.

Indexed as

CodonGenotypeAdultAgingApoptosisCell Line, TumorChild, PreschoolFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNeuroblastomaCodonProtein IsoformsTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID22904680
PMCPMC3421959
OpenAlexW1857107590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.