ArticleAmerican sociological review2011
Variance Function Regression in Hierarchical Age-Period-Cohort Models: Applications to the Study of Self-Reported Health.
Article in American sociological review, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global temporal trends and predictions in the burden of chronic kidney disease attributable to diet high in sugar-sweetened beverages: an age-period-cohort analysis for GBD 2021.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Association of Traumatic Injury and Incident Myocardial Infarction and Stroke: A Prospective Population-Based Cohort Study.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Trends in cannabis use intention around the period of cannabis legalisation in Australia: An age-period-cohort model.Drug and alcohol review · 2023Article
- Ways of HIV transmission in China: The effect of age, period, and cohort.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Trajectories of unsecured debt and health at midlife.SSM - population health · 2021Article
- Cross-classified multilevel models (CCMM) in health research: A systematic review of published empirical studies and recommendations for best practices.SSM - population health · 2020Review
- Age, period and birth cohort effects on prevalence of obesity among reproductive-age women in India.SSM - population health · 2019Article
- Corner vowels in males and females ages 4 to 20 years: Fundamental and F1-F4 formant frequencies.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019Article
- Health status in a transitional society: urban-rural disparities from a dynamic perspective in China.Population health metrics · 2018Article
- Chronic disease self-management education courses: utilization by low-income, middle-aged participants.International journal for equity in health · 2017Article
- Disparities in self-rated health across generations and through the life course.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2017Article
- Trends in self-rated health and association with socioeconomic position in Estonia: data from cross-sectional studies in 1996-2014.International journal for equity in health · 2016Article
- Improving but unequal: Temporal trends in Chinese self-rated health, 1990-2012.SSM - population health · 2016Article
- Age-Specific Variation in Adult Mortality Rates in Developed Countries.Population research and policy review · 2016Article
- Longitudinal trends in good self-rated health: effects of age and birth cohort in a 25-year follow-up study in Sweden.International journal of public health · 2015Article
- Racial disparities in self-rated health: trends, explanatory factors, and the changing role of socio-demographics.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2014Article
- Sex, gender, genetics, and health.American journal of public health · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Two long-standing research problems of interest to sociologists are sources of variations in social inequalities and differential contributions of the temporal dimensions of age, time period, and cohort to variations in social phenomena. Recently, scholars have introduced a model called Variance Function Regression for the study of the former problem, and a model called Hierarchical Age-Period-Cohort regression has been developed for the study of the latter. This article presents an integration of these two models as a means to study the evolution of social inequalities along distinct temporal dimensions. We apply the integrated model to survey data on subjective health status. We find substantial age, period, and cohort effects, as well as gender differences, not only for the conditional mean of self-rated health (i.e., between-group disparities), but also for the variance in this mean (i.e., within-group disparities)-and it is detection of age, period, and cohort variations in the latter disparities that application of the integrated model permits. Net of effects of age and individual-level covariates, in recent decades, cohort differences in conditional means of self-rated health have been less important than period differences that cut across all cohorts. By contrast, cohort differences of variances in these conditional means have dominated period differences. In particular, post-baby boom birth cohorts show significant and increasing levels of within-group disparities. These findings illustrate how the integrated model provides a powerful framework through which to identify and study the evolution of variations in social inequalities across age, period, and cohort temporal dimensions. Accordingly, this model should be broadly applicable to the study of social inequality in many different substantive contexts.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.