Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22904372›Full record

ReviewLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)2012

Consolidation and translation regulation.

Shunit Gal-Ben-Ari, Justin W Kenney, Hadile Ounalla-Saad, Elham Taha, Orit David, David Levitan, Iness Gildish, Debabrata Panja, Balagopal Pai, Karin Wibrand and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Deletion ofeLife · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Dietary polyphenols promote resilience against sleep deprivation-induced cognitive impairment by activating protein translation.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2018
    Article
  17. Metabolic Effects of Metformin in the Failing Heart.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Local Inhibition of PERK Enhances Memory and Reverses Age-Related Deterioration of Cognitive and Neuronal Properties.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Shunit Gal-Ben-AriSagol Department of Neurobiology, University of Haifa, Haifa 31905, Israel.
Justin W Kenney
Hadile Ounalla-Saad
Elham Taha
Orit David
David Levitan
Iness Gildish
Debabrata Panja
Balagopal Pai
Karin Wibrand
T Ian Simpson
Christopher G Proud
Clive R Bramham
J Douglas Armstrong
Kobi Rosenblum
University of Haifa · ILUniversity of Bergen · NOUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I004483/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I004491/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

mRNA translation, or protein synthesis, is a major component of the transformation of the genetic code into any cellular activity. This complicated, multistep process is divided into three phases: initiation, elongation, and termination. Initiation is the step at which the ribosome is recruited to the mRNA, and is regarded as the major rate-limiting step in translation, while elongation consists of the elongation of the polypeptide chain; both steps are frequent targets for regulation, which is defined as a change in the rate of translation of an mRNA per unit time. In the normal brain, control of translation is a key mechanism for regulation of memory and synaptic plasticity consolidation, i.e., the off-line processing of acquired information. These regulation processes may differ between different brain structures or neuronal populations. Moreover, dysregulation of translation leads to pathological brain function such as memory impairment. Both normal and abnormal function of the translation machinery is believed to lead to translational up-regulation or down-regulation of a subset of mRNAs. However, the identification of these newly synthesized proteins and determination of the rates of protein synthesis or degradation taking place in different neuronal types and compartments at different time points in the brain demand new proteomic methods and system biology approaches. Here, we discuss in detail the relationship between translation regulation and memory or synaptic plasticity consolidation while focusing on a model of cortical-dependent taste learning task and hippocampal-dependent plasticity. In addition, we describe a novel systems biology perspective to better describe consolidation.

Indexed as

AnimalsCerebral CortexGene Expression RegulationHippocampusHumansMemoryMicroRNAsModels, MolecularNervous System DiseasesNeuronsNeurotransmitter AgentsProtein BiosynthesisTasteMicroRNAsNeurotransmitter Agents

Identifiers

PMID22904372
PMCPMC3418764
OpenAlexW2099717181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.