ArticleNucleic acids research2012
Subtypes of associated protein-DNA (Transcription Factor-Transcription Factor Binding Site) patterns.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Improved Method for Identifying Specific DNA-Protein-Binding Sites In Vitro.Molecular biotechnology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In protein-DNA interactions, particularly transcription factor (TF) and transcription factor binding site (TFBS) bindings, associated residue variations form patterns denoted as subtypes. Subtypes may lead to changed binding preferences, distinguish conserved from flexible binding residues and reveal novel binding mechanisms. However, subtypes must be studied in the context of core bindings. While solving 3D structures would require huge experimental efforts, recent sequence-based associated TF-TFBS pattern discovery has shown to be promising, upon which a large-scale subtype study is possible and desirable. In this article, we investigate residue-varying subtypes based on associated TF-TFBS patterns. By re-categorizing the patterns with respect to varying TF amino acids, statistically significant (P values ≤ 0.005) subtypes leading to varying TFBS patterns are discovered without using TF family or domain annotations. Resultant subtypes have various biological meanings. The subtypes reflect familial and functional properties and exhibit changed binding preferences supported by 3D structures. Conserved residues critical for maintaining TF-TFBS bindings are revealed by analyzing the subtypes. In-depth analysis on the subtype pair PKVVIL-CACGTG versus PKVEIL-CAGCTG shows the V/E variation is indicative for distinguishing Myc from MRF families. Discovered from sequences only, the TF-TFBS subtypes are informative and promising for more biological findings, complementing and extending recent one-sided subtype and familial studies with comprehensive evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.