Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22904033›Full record

ArticleGenetics2012

NAT1/DAP5/p97 and atypical translational control in the Drosophila Circadian Oscillator.

Sean Bradley, Siddhartha Narayanan, Michael Rosbash

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. eLife · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Circadian clock regulation of mRNA translation through eukaryotic elongation factor eEF-2.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The molecular ticks of the Drosophila circadian clock.Current opinion in insect science · 2015
    Article
  13. Glial cell regulation of rhythmic behavior.Methods in enzymology · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sean BradleyHoward Hughes Medical Institute, National Center for Behavioral Genomics, Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454-9110, USA.
Siddhartha Narayanan
Michael Rosbash
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · USBrandeis University · US

Funding

THE MOLECULAR GENETIC BASIS OF SENSORY BEHAVIOR IN DROSOPHILAP01NS044232 · NINDS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI GRIFFITH, LESLIE C · 2002 to 2011
$13.2M
GENETIC AND BIOCHEMICAL MECHANISMS OF REGULATIONT32GM007122 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI LOVETT, SUSAN THOMAS · 1985 to 2020
$7.5M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007122NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM007122NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS044232NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS44232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circadian rhythms are driven by gene expression feedback loops in metazoans. Based on the success of genetic screens for circadian mutants in Drosophila melanogaster, we undertook a targeted RNAi screen to study the impact of translation control genes on circadian locomotor activity rhythms in flies. Knockdown of vital translation factors in timeless protein-positive circadian neurons caused a range of effects including lethality. Knockdown of the atypical translation factor NAT1 had the strongest effect and lengthened circadian period. It also dramatically reduced PER protein levels in pigment dispersing factor (PDF) neurons. BELLE (BEL) protein was also reduced by the NAT1 knockdown, presumably reflecting a role of NAT1 in belle mRNA translation. belle and NAT1 are also targets of the key circadian transcription factor Clock (CLK). Further evidence for a role of NAT1 is that inhibition of the target of rapamycin (TOR) kinase increased oscillator activity in cultured wings, which is absent under conditions of NAT1 knockdown. Moreover, the per 5'- and 3'-UTRs may function together to facilitate cap-independent translation under conditions of TOR inhibition. We suggest that NAT1 and cap-independent translation are important for per mRNA translation, which is also important for the circadian oscillator. A circadian translation program may be especially important in fly pacemaker cells.

Indexed as

Protein BiosynthesisAnimalsBiological ClocksBrainCircadian RhythmDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsEukaryotic Initiation Factor-4GGene Knockdown TechniquesLightNeuropeptidesPeriod Circadian ProteinsRNA HelicasesTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesBel protein, DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsEukaryotic Initiation Factor-4GNAT1 translation factor, DrosophilaNeuropeptidespdf protein, DrosophilaPeriod Circadian ProteinsPER protein, DrosophilaRNA HelicasesTOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID22904033
PMCPMC3522168
OpenAlexW1997392927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.