ArticleGenes & nutrition2013
Nutrigenomics-based personalised nutritional advice: in search of a business model?
Article in Genes & nutrition, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The effect of communicating the genetic risk of cardiometabolic disorders on motivation and actual engagement in preventative lifestyle modification and clinical outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.The British journal of nutrition · 2016Pooled it
- Nutrigenomics in precision livestock and poultry farming: Enhancing productivity, welfare, and sustainability through gene-tailored diets.Veterinary and animal science · 2026Review
- Precision Nutraceuticals and Biomarkers of Healthy Aging: A Scoping Review of Human Studies on Nutrigenomic-Based Interventions.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An Explanation Interface for Healthy Food Recommendations in a Real-Life Workplace Deployment: User-Centered Design Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2025Article
- Public perceptions of biospecimen sampling and uncertainty in the context of personalised nutrition.PloS one · 2025Article
- Drug-food Interactions in the Era of Molecular Big Data, Machine Intelligence, and Personalized Health.Recent advances in food, nutrition & agriculture · 2022Review
- Short and Long-Term Innovations on Dietary Behavior Assessment and Coaching: Present Efforts and Vision of the Pride and Prejudice Consortium.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Consumer acceptance of genetic-based personalized nutrition in Hungary.Genes & nutrition · 2021Article
- Personalized Nutrition Advice: Preferred Ways of Receiving Information Related to Psychological Characteristics.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Article
- Perspective: Metabotyping-A Potential Personalized Nutrition Strategy for Precision Prevention of Cardiometabolic Disease.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
- Review
- Consumer adoption of personalised nutrition services from the perspective of a risk-benefit trade-off.Genes & nutrition · 2015Article
- The perceived impact of the National Health Service on personalised nutrition service delivery among the UK public.The British journal of nutrition · 2015Article
- Psychological determinants of consumer acceptance of personalised nutrition in 9 European countries.PloS one · 2014Article
- Nutrigenomics: definitions and advances of this new science.Journal of nutrition and metabolism · 2014Review
- Risks of nutrigenomics and nutrigenetics? What the scientists say.Genes & nutrition · 2014Article
- Consumers on the Internet: ethical and legal aspects of commercialization of personalized nutrition.Genes & nutrition · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nutritional advice has mainly focused on population-level recommendations. Recent developments in nutrition, communication, and marketing sciences have enabled potential deviations from this dominant business model in the direction of personalisation of nutrition advice. Such personalisation efforts can take on many forms, but these have in common that they can only be effective if they are supported by a viable business model. The present paper takes an inventory of approaches to personalised nutrition currently available in the market place as its starting point to arrive at an identification of their underlying business models. This analysis is presented as a unifying framework against which the potential of nutrigenomics-based personalised advice can be assessed. It has uncovered nine archetypical approaches to personalised nutrition advice in terms of their dominant underlying business models. Differentiating features among such business models are the type of information that is used as a basis for personalisation, the definition of the target group, the communication channels that are being adopted, and the partnerships that are built as a part of the business model. Future research should explore the consumer responses to the diversity of "archetypical" business models for personalised nutrition advice as a source of market information on which the delivery of nutrigenomics-based personalised nutrition advice may further build.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.