Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22903605›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2013

Disease modification of breast cancer-induced bone remodeling by cannabinoid 2 receptor agonists.

Alysia N Lozano-Ondoua, Katherine E Hanlon, Ashley M Symons-Liguori, Tally M Largent-Milnes, Josh J Havelin, Henry L Ferland, Anupama Chandramouli, Mabel Owusu-Ankomah, Tijana Nikolich-Zugich, Aaron P Bloom and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Unraveling Endocannabinoid Signaling Pathways in Cisplatin-Induced Ototoxicity.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Cannabinoid CBBritish journal of pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cannabidiol and Cannabigerol, Nonpsychotropic Cannabinoids, as Analgesics that Effectively Manage Bone Fracture Pain and Promote Healing in Mice.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cancer induced bone pain: current management and future perspectives.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alysia N Lozano-Ondoua *Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Katherine E Hanlon *Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Ashley M Symons-LiguoriDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Tally M Largent-MilnesDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Josh J HavelinDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Osteopathic Medicine, University of New England, Biddeford, ME, USA.
Henry L FerlandDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Osteopathic Medicine, University of New England, Biddeford, ME, USA.
Anupama ChandramouliDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Mabel Owusu-AnkomahDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Tijana Nikolich-ZugichDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Aaron P BloomDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Juan Miguel Jimenez-AndradeDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Tamara KingDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Frank PorrecaDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Mark A NelsonDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Patrick W MantyhDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Todd W VanderahDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
University of Arizona · USUniversity of New England · US

Funding

Cannabinoid CB2 Agonists for Treatment of Breast Cancer-Induced Bone PainR01CA142115 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI VANDERAH, TODD W · 2010 to 2021
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA142115NCI NIH HHS R01 CA142115-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most commonly originating from breast malignancies, metastatic bone cancer causes bone destruction and severe pain. Although novel chemotherapeutic agents have increased life expectancy, patients are experiencing higher incidences of fracture, pain, and drug-induced side effects; furthermore, recent findings suggest that patients are severely undertreated for their cancer pain. Strong analgesics, namely opiates, are first-line therapy in alleviating cancer-related pain despite the severe side effects, including enhanced bone destruction with sustained administration. Bone resorption is primarily treated with bisphosphonates, which are associated with highly undesirable side effects, including nephrotoxicity and osteonecrosis of the jaw. In contrast, cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB(2) ) receptor-specific agonists have been shown to reduce bone loss and stimulate bone formation in a model of osteoporosis. CB(2) agonists produce analgesia in both inflammatory and neuropathic pain models. Notably, mixed CB(1) /CB(2) agonists also demonstrate a reduction in ErbB2-driven breast cancer progression. Here we demonstrate for the first time that CB(2) agonists reduce breast cancer-induced bone pain, bone loss, and breast cancer proliferation via cytokine/chemokine suppression. Studies used the spontaneously-occurring murine mammary cell line (66.1) implanted into the femur intramedullary space; measurements of spontaneous pain, bone loss, and cancer proliferation were made. The systemic administration of a CB(2) agonist, JWH015, for 7 days significantly attenuated bone remodeling, assuaged spontaneous pain, and decreased primary tumor burden. CB(2) -mediated effects in vivo were reversed by concurrent treatment with a CB(2) antagonist/inverse agonist but not with a CB(1) antagonist/inverse agonist. In vitro, JWH015 reduced cancer cell proliferation and inflammatory mediators that have been shown to promote pain, bone loss, and proliferation. Taken together, these results suggest CB(2) agonists as a novel treatment for breast cancer-induced bone pain, in which disease modifications include a reduction in bone loss, suppression of cancer growth, attenuation of severe bone pain, and increased survival without the major side effects of current therapeutic options.

Indexed as

AnimalsBody WeightBone RemodelingBone ResorptionCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsCannabinoidsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleFemurFractures, BoneIndolesMammary Neoplasms, AnimalMiceMice, Inbred BALB CAM 1241Cannabinoid Receptor AgonistsCannabinoidsIndolesJHW 015Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2

Identifiers

PMID22903605
PMCPMC4745976
OpenAlexW1964020207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.