ArticlePsychopharmacology2013
Pharmacological effects of cannabinoids on the reference and working memory functions in mice.
Article in Psychopharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Cholecystokinin-Expressing Interneurons of the Medial Prefrontal Cortex Mediate Working Memory Retrieval.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020Article
- Adverse neuropsychiatric development following perinatal brain injury: from a preclinical perspective.Pediatric research · 2019Review
- Postnatal MK-801 treatment of female rats impairs acquisition of working memory, but not reference memory in an eight-arm radial maze; no beneficial effects of enriched environment.Psychopharmacology · 2015Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleEvidence indicates cannabinoid receptor agonists impair performance in procedures to assess memory that may also be confounded by motivational or motor effects, both of which occur with cannabinoids. Thus, convergence of evidence from a variety of procedures that differ in motivation, attention, arousal and response requirements, but share a common reliance on memory, is required. There are no current reports on cannabinoid effects on mice tested in the radial arm maze.
objectivesThe objective was to determine the effects of the cannabinoid agonist CP 55940 and the dependence of any such effects on the CB1 receptor using the CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716A on two strains of mice in the eight-arm radial maze procedure.
methodsMale C57BL/6J (N = 36) and C3H/HEJ (N = 12) mice were trained to a criterion and then were treated (IP) with vehicle + vehicle, SR 141716A + vehicle, vehicle + CP 55940 and SR 141716A + CP 55940 in a fully balanced mixed design prior to further tests in the maze. Reference (long-term) and working (short-term) memory were assessed.
resultsCP 55940 impaired performance of the reference memory task in the C57BL/6J strain but not the C3H/HEJ strain; SR 141716A reversed the effect of CP 55940 on these measures. CP 55940 also increased working memory errors in the C57BL/6J mice only, which was not affected by SR 141716A.
conclusionThe present study provides evidence for a strain-specific effect of a dose of CP 55940 on reference memory. While the cannabinoid agonist also impaired working memory in one strain, this effect was apparently not mediated by CB1 receptors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.