Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22903142›Full record

ReviewDrug discovery today2013

Emergence of zebrafish models in oncology for validating novel anticancer drug targets and nanomaterials.

Murielle Mimeault, Surinder K Batra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug discovery today, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Zebrafish as a Model for Anticancer Nanomedicine Studies.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. The study of glioma by xenotransplantation in zebrafish early life stages.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2015
    Review
  12. Transgenic plants as low-cost platform for chemotherapeutic drugs screening.International journal of molecular sciences · 2015
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Current pathobiology reports · 2014
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Murielle MimeaultDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine, Eppley Cancer Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-5870, USA. mmimeault@unmc.edu
Surinder K Batra

Funding

Early Diagnosis of Pancreatic CancerU01CA111294 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BATRA, SURINDER K., HOLLINGSWORTH, MICHAEL A. · 2004 to 2015
$7.1M
Role of N-Cadherin in Pancreatic Tumor MicroenvironmentU54CA163120 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BATRA, SURINDER K. · 2011 to 2015
$4.2M
Novel deregulated genes in the etiology and progression of human prostate cancerR01CA138791 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BATRA, SURINDER K. · 2010 to 2014
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA138791NCI NIH HHS U01 CA111294NCI NIH HHS U54 CA163120NCI NIH HHS UO1 CA111294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The in vivo zebrafish models have recently attracted great attention in molecular oncology to investigate multiple genetic alterations associated with the development of human cancers and validate novel anticancer drug targets. Particularly, the transparent zebrafish models can be used as a xenotransplantation system to rapidly assess the tumorigenicity and metastatic behavior of cancer stem and/or progenitor cells and their progenies. Moreover, the zebrafish models have emerged as powerful tools for an in vivo testing of novel anticancer agents and nanomaterials for counteracting tumor formation and metastases and improving the efficacy of current radiation and chemotherapeutic treatments against aggressive, metastatic and lethal cancers.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalNanostructuresZebrafishAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsHumansNeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID22903142
PMCPMC3562372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.