Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22902512›Full record

ReviewRespiratory physiology & neurobiology2013

Comparative embryology of the carotid body.

Steven C Hempleman, Stephen J Warburton

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Respiratory physiology & neurobiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Carotid body oxygen sensing and adaptation to hypoxia.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2016
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Carotid chemoreceptor "resetting" revisited.Respiratory physiology & neurobiology · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steven C HemplemanDepartment of Biology, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA. steven.hempleman@nau.edu
Stephen J Warburton
Northern Arizona University · US

Funding

Signal Transduction in Intrapulmonary ChemoreceptorsR15HL087269 · NHLBI · NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY · PI HEMPLEMAN, STEVEN C · 2007 to 2010
$662k
NHLBI NIH HHS 2R15HL087269-02NHLBI NIH HHS R15 HL087269
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vertebrate carotid bodies and related structures (branchial arch oxygen chemoreceptors in fishes, carotid labyrinth in amphibians, chemoreceptors in the wall of the common carotid and its branches in birds) develop in embryos when neural crest cells, blood vessels, and nerve fibers from sympathetic and cranial nerve ganglia invade mesenchymal primordia in the wall of the 3rd branchial arch. This review focuses on literature published since the 1970s investigating similarities and differences in the embryological development of 3rd arch oxygen chemoreceptors, especially between mammals and birds, but also considering reptiles, amphibians and fishes.

Indexed as

Anatomy, ComparativeAnimalsCarotid BodyHumans

Identifiers

PMID22902512
PMCPMC3511657
OpenAlexW2053245929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.