Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22901013›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2012

Binding interaction of HMGB4 with cisplatin-modified DNA.

Semi Park, Stephen J Lippard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Structure and Functions of HMGB2 Protein.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  3. High Mobility Group Proteins in Sepsis.Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  4. Functional Diversity of Non-Histone Chromosomal Protein HmgB1.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Targeting Transcription Factors for Cancer Treatment.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. HMGB1 in health and disease.Molecular aspects of medicine · 2014
    Review
  14. The chemosensitivity of testicular germ cell tumors.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2014
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Semi ParkDepartment of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139-4307, USA.
Stephen J Lippard
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Understanding and Improving Platinum Anticancer DrugsR01CA034992 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI YILMAZ, OMER · 1985 to 2018
$6.8M
CHEMISTRY AND BIOLOGY OF PLATINUM ANTICANCER DRUGSR37CA034992 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI LIPPARD, STEPHEN J. · 1990 to 2008
$5.7M
NCI NIH HHS CA034992NCI NIH HHS R01 CA034992NCI NIH HHS R37 CA034992
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins in the HMG family are important transcription factors. They recognize cisplatin-damaged DNA lesions with a structure-specific preference and account for more than 70% of all proteins that interact with the cisplatin 1,2-intrastrand d(GpG) cross-link. HMGB4, a new member of the mammalian HMGB protein family expressed preferentially in the testis, was generated recombinantly, and its interactions with cisplatin-modified DNA were investigated in vitro. The binding affinities of the two individual DNA-binding domains of HMGB4 to DNA carrying a cisplatin 1,2-intrastrand d(GpG) cross-link are weaker than those of the DNA-binding domains of HMGB1. Full-length HMGB4, however, has a 28-fold stronger binding affinity (K(d) = 4.35 nM) for the platinated adduct compared to that of HMGB1 (K(d) = 120 nM), presumably because the former lacks a C-terminal acidic tail. The residue Phe37 plays a critical role in stabilizing the binding complex of HMGB4 with the cisplatin-modified DNA, as it does for HMGB1. Hydroxyl radical footprinting analysis of the HMGB4/platinated DNA complex reveals a footprinting pattern very different from that of HMGB1, however, revealing very little binding asymmetry with respect to the platinated lesion. An in vitro repair assay revealed that HMGB4, at 1 μM, interferes with repair of cisplatin 1,2-intrastrand cross-link damage by >90% compared to control, whereas HMGB1 at the same concentration inhibits repair by 45%. This repair inhibition capability is highly dependent on both the binding affinity and the size of the proteins. The putative role of HMGB4 in the mechanism of action of cisplatin, and especially its potential relevance to the hypersensitivity of testicular germ cell tumors to cisplatin, are discussed.

Indexed as

Amino Acid MotifsAnimalsBase SequenceCisplatinDNADNA AdductsDNA RepairHMGB ProteinsKineticsMiceMolecular Sequence DataProtein BindingCisplatinDNADNA AdductsHMGB4 protein, mouseHMGB Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22901013
PMCPMC3448822
OpenAlexW2044143800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.