ArticleBMC health services research2012
Smoking and use of primary care services: findings from a population-based cohort study linked with administrative claims data.
Article in BMC health services research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Number of Influenza Risk Factors Informs an Adult's Increased Potential of Severe Influenza Outcomes: A Multiseason Cohort Study From 2015 to 2020.Open forum infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Investigating Awareness Regarding Travel-Related Infectious Disease Prevention in a Metropolitan Area.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023Article
- Understanding Factors Contributing to Vaccine Hesitancy in a Large Metropolitan Area.Vaccines · 2023Article
- Current tobacco use patterns associated with healthcare utilization among non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic men with chronic conditions.Addictive behaviors · 2023Article
- Seeking lifestyle counselling at primary health care centres: a cross-sectional study in the Swedish population.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- The Impact of Smokers' Information-Seeking Behavior on Smoking Cessation.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023Article
- The relative impact of underweight, overweight, smoking, and physical inactivity on health and associated costs in Indonesia: propensity score matching of a national sample.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Retrospective Study of Appropriate Primary Prevention in Postmenopausal Women Presenting with a Major Adverse Cardiovascular Endpoint (MACE).Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Evolving Primary Care Utilization of Transgender and Gender-Nonconforming People at a Community Sexual Health Clinic.Transgender health · 2022Article
- Impact of Tobacco Smoking on Health Care Utilization and Medical Costs in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Coronary Heart Disease and Diabetes.Current medical science · 2022Article
- Associations of At-Risk Drinking, Current Smoking, and Their Co-Occurrence With Primary Care Service Utilization.American journal of health promotion : AJHP · 2022Article
- The effects of smoking, regular drinking, and unhealthy weight on health care utilization in China.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Patient-specific factors associated with use of diabetes self-management education and support programs in Louisiana.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2021Article
- Clinical characteristics of patients with chronic cough in Guangdong, China: a multicenter descriptive study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2021Observational
- Healthcare Access, Utilization, and Preventive Health Behaviors by Eligibility for Lung Cancer Screening.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021Article
- Out of reach? Correlates of cervical cancer underscreening in women with varying levels of healthcare interactions in a United States integrated delivery system.Preventive medicine · 2021Article
- The relationship of smoking and unhealthy alcohol use to the HIV care continuum among people with HIV in an integrated health care system.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2021Article
- Who are we missing with EHR-Based Smoking Cessation Treatments? A Descriptive Study of Patients who Smoke and Do Not Regularly Visit Primary Care Clinics.Journal of smoking cessation · 2020Article
- Review
- Age and Sex Distribution of Chinese Chronic Cough Patients and Their Relationship With Capsaicin Cough Sensitivity.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAvailable evidence suggests that smokers have a lower propensity than others to use primary care services. But previous studies have incorporated only limited adjustment for confounding and mediating factors such as income, access to services and health status. We used data from a large prospective cohort study (the 45 and Up Study), linked to administrative claims data, to quantify the relationship between smoking status and use of primary care services, including specific preventive services, in a contemporary Australian population.
methodsBaseline questionnaire data from the 45 and Up Study were linked to administrative claims (Medicare) data for the 12-month period following study entry. The main outcome measures were Medicare benefit claimed for unreferred services, out-of-pocket costs (OOPC) paid, and claims for specific preventive services (immunisations, health assessments, chronic disease management services, PSA tests and Pap smears). Rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated using a hierarchical series of models, adjusted for predisposing, access- and health-related factors. Separate hurdle (two part) regression models were constructed for Medicare benefit and OOPC. Poisson models with robust error variance were used to model use of each specific preventive service.
resultsParticipants included 254,382 people aged 45 years and over of whom 7.3% were current smokers. After adjustment for predisposing, access- and health-related factors, current smokers were very slightly less likely to have claimed Medicare benefit than never smokers. Among those who claimed benefit, current smokers claimed similar total benefit, but recent quitters claimed significantly greater benefit, compared to never-smokers. Current smokers were around 10% less likely than never smokers to have paid any OOPC. Current smokers were 15-20% less likely than never smokers to use immunisations, Pap smears and prostate specific antigen tests.
conclusionsCurrent smokers were less likely than others to use primary care services that incurred out of pocket costs, and specific preventive services. This was independent of a wide range of predisposing, access- and health-related factors, suggesting that smokers have a lower propensity to seek health care. Smokers may be missing out on preventive services from which they would differentially benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.