ArticlePloS one2012
Transcriptomic analysis of the developing and adult mouse cochlear sensory epithelia.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative assessment of Fgf's diverse roles in inner ear development: A zebrafish perspective.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2021Review
- Association of erectile dysfunction with tinnitus: a nationwide population-based study.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Growth Hormone and the Auditory Pathway: Neuromodulation and Neuroregeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- HMGA Genes and Proteins in Development and Evolution.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Correction: HMGA2, the architectural transcription factor high mobility group, is expressed in the developing and mature mouse cochlea.PloS one · 2020Article
- Correction: Transcriptomic analysis of the developing and adult mouse cochlear sensory epithelia.PloS one · 2020Article
- Transcriptomic analysis of mouse cochleae suffering from gentamicin damage reveals the signalling pathways involved in hair cell regeneration.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Review
- Article
- Article
- Gene expression profiling of the inner ear.Journal of anatomy · 2016Review
- Minireview: Extrapituitary prolactin: an update on the distribution, regulation, and functions.Molecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2014Review
- Epigenetic regulation in the inner ear and its potential roles in development, protection, and regeneration.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2014Review
- HMGA2, the architectural transcription factor high mobility group, is expressed in the developing and mature mouse cochlea.PloS one · 2014Article
- In-depth proteomic analysis of mouse cochlear sensory epithelium by mass spectrometry.Journal of proteome research · 2013Article
- The Transcriptomics to Proteomics of Hair Cell Regeneration: Looking for a Hair Cell in a Haystack.Microarrays (Basel, Switzerland) · 2013Article
- Postnatal development, maturation and aging in the mouse cochlea and their effects on hair cell regeneration.Hearing research · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The adult mammalian cochlea lacks regenerative ability and the irreversible degeneration of cochlear sensory hair cells leads to permanent hearing loss. Previous data show that early postnatal cochlea harbors stem/progenitor-like cells and shows a limited regenerative/repair capacity. These properties are progressively lost later during the postnatal development. Little is known about the genes and pathways that are potentially involved in this difference of the regenerative/repair potentialities between early postnatal and adult mammalian cochlear sensory epithelia (CSE). The goal of our study is to investigate the transcriptomic profiles of these two stages. We used Mouse Genome 430 2.0 microarray to perform an extensive analysis of the genes expressed in mouse postnatal day-3 (P3) and adult CSE. Statistical analysis of microarray data was performed using SAM (Significance Analysis of Microarrays) software. We identified 5644 statistically significant differentially expressed transcripts with a fold change (FC) >2 and a False Discovery Rate (FDR) ≤0.05. The P3 CSE signature included 3,102 transcripts, among which were known genes in the cochlea, but also new transcripts such as, Hmga2 (high mobility group AT-hook 2) and Nrarp (Notch-regulated ankyrin repeat protein). The adult CSE overexpressed 2,542 transcripts including new transcripts, such as Prl (Prolactin) and Ar (Androgen receptor), that previously were not known to be expressed in the adult cochlea. Our comparative study revealed important genes and pathways differentially expressed between the developing and adult CSE. The identification of new candidate genes would be useful as potential markers of the maintenance or the loss of stem cells and regenerative/repair ability during mammalian cochlear development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.