ArticlePloS one2012
Not all sequence tags are created equal: designing and validating sequence identification tags robust to indels.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 118 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
118 citing papers in PubMed, 303 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distinct patterns of within-host virus populations between two subgroups of human respiratory syncytial virus.Nature communications · 2021Trial
- Effects of Aspergillus sp. supplementation with or without xylanase on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and the gastrointestinal microbiome of broilers.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Maternal copy number variations detected by noninvasive prenatal testing in Japanese women.Journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- Fast barcode calling based onPNAS nexus · 2026Article
- The complete genome sequence of the helmeted hornbill (Biodiversity genomes · 2026Article
- Evaluating UCE Data Adequacy and Integrating Uncertainty in a Comprehensive Phylogeny of Ants.Systematic biology · 2025Article
- Selection for Tameness in Red Junglefowl Recapitulates Genetic Loci Associated With Domestication-Related Brain Composition.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Inbreeding does not reduce major histocompatibility complex diversity in the banded mongoose.BMC ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Article
- Widespread scope for coral adaptation under combined ocean warming and acidification.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Differential association of key bacterial groups with diatoms and Phaeocystis spp. during spring blooms in the Southern Ocean.MicrobiologyOpen · 2024Article
- Host-gut microbiota interactions shape parasite infections in farmed Atlantic salmon.mSystems · 2024Article
- Confusion will be my epitaph: genome-scale discordance stifles phylogenetic resolution of Holothuroidea.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- High functional allelic diversity and copy number in both MHC classes in the common buzzard.BMC ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- First description of the mitochondrial genomes of the Central American brocket deer Mazama temama (Kerr, 1792) and the Yucatán Peninsula brocket deer Odocoileus pandora Merriam, 1901.Molecular biology reports · 2023Article
- Range-wide population genomics of common seadragons shows secondary contact over a former barrier and insights on illegal capture.BMC biology · 2023Article
- Key innovations and the diversification of Hymenoptera.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Systematic optimization of Cas12a base editors in wheat and maize using the ITER platform.Genome biology · 2023Article
- DNAsmart: Multiple attribute ranking tool for DNA data storage systems.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- A comparison of three different delivery methods for achieving CRISPR/Cas9 mediated genome editing inFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
58 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ligating adapters with unique synthetic oligonucleotide sequences (sequence tags) onto individual DNA samples before massively parallel sequencing is a popular and efficient way to obtain sequence data from many individual samples. Tag sequences should be numerous and sufficiently different to ensure sequencing, replication, and oligonucleotide synthesis errors do not cause tags to be unrecoverable or confused. However, many design approaches only protect against substitution errors during sequencing and extant tag sets contain too few tag sequences. We developed an open-source software package to validate sequence tags for conformance to two distance metrics and design sequence tags robust to indel and substitution errors. We use this software package to evaluate several commercial and non-commercial sequence tag sets, design several large sets (max(count) = 7,198) of edit metric sequence tags having different lengths and degrees of error correction, and integrate a subset of these edit metric tags to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers and sequencing adapters. We validate a subset of these edit metric tagged PCR primers and sequencing adapters by sequencing on several platforms and subsequent comparison to commercially available alternatives. We find that several commonly used sets of sequence tags or design methodologies used to produce sequence tags do not meet the minimum expectations of their underlying distance metric, and we find that PCR primers and sequencing adapters incorporating edit metric sequence tags designed by our software package perform as well as their commercial counterparts. We suggest that researchers evaluate sequence tags prior to use or evaluate tags that they have been using. The sequence tag sets we design improve on extant sets because they are large, valid across the set, and robust to the suite of substitution, insertion, and deletion errors affecting massively parallel sequencing workflows on all currently used platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.