Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22899904›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology research and practice2012

Probiotics, symptoms, and gut microbiota: what are the relations? A randomized controlled trial in subjects with irritable bowel syndrome.

Per G Farup, Morten Jacobsen, Solveig C Ligaarden, Knut Rudi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00355810 (Lactobacillus Plantarum MF 1298 vs Placebo for Irritable Bowel Syndrome.), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00355810 nacompletednot on this map

Lactobacillus Plantarum MF 1298 vs Placebo for Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyRan2006 to 2006Enrolled19ConditionsFunctional Gastrointestinal Disorders, Irritable Bowel SyndromeArmsplacebo followed by Lactobacillus plantarum MF 1298, Lactobacillus plantarum MF1298 followed by placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Gut Microbiota and Chronic Pain.Current pain and headache reports · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Close association between intestinal microbiota and irritable bowel syndrome.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2017
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Probiotic lactic acid bacteria - the fledgling cuckoos of the gut?Microbial ecology in health and disease · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Gut microbiota, probiotics, and human health.Bioscience of microbiota, food and health · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Per G FarupDepartment of Research, Innlandet Hospital Trust, 2819 Gjøvik, Norway.
Morten Jacobsen
Solveig C Ligaarden
Knut Rudi
Innlandet Hospital Trust · NONofima · NONorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOØstfold Hospital Trust · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction. Knowledge of the mechanism of action of probiotics in subjects with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is imperfect. Objective. This trial aimed at discriminating between a direct effect on the gut wall and an indirect effect caused by modulation of the fecal microbiota. Design. Randomized, double-blind, crossover trial. Material and Methods. Patients with IBS were given one capsule of 10(10) CFU L. plantarum MF 1298 or placebo once daily. Symptoms were registered (score 0-15) and feces collected at the end of each period. The gut microbiota was analyzed with 16S rRNA gene analyses and results reported as proportions of Bacteroides, Faecalibacterium, and Lachnospiraceae and Simpson's D diversity score. Results. Sixteen participants (11 women) with a mean age of 50 years (SD 11) were available for the analyses. Intake of L. plantarum MF 1298 was associated with a significant aggravation of symptoms, but neither intake of L. plantarum MF 1298 nor symptoms were associated with the composition of the fecal microbiota (P values >0.10). Conclusions. The trial indicates that the symptomatic aggravation related to intake of L. plantarum MF 1298 was a direct effect of the microbe on the gut wall and not caused by changes in the fecal microbiota.

Identifiers

PMID22899904
PMCPMC3415104
OpenAlexW2151351910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.