Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22899718›Full record

ArticleJournal of cell science2012

Filopodium retraction is controlled by adhesion to its tip.

Stephane Romero, Alessia Quatela, Thomas Bornschlögl, Thomas Bornschlög, Stéphanie Guadagnini, Patricia Bassereau, Guy Tran Van Nhieu

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cell science, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Natural Fish Trap-Like Nanocage for Label-Free Capture of Circulating Tumor Cells.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Microbiology spectrum · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Helical buckling of actin inside filopodia generates traction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  17. Filopodial retraction force is generated by cortical actin dynamics and controlled by reversible tethering at the tip.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  18. The inside story of Shigella invasion of intestinal epithelial cells.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2013
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Cell signaling experiments driven by optical manipulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Bornschlög, Thomas [corrected to Bornschlögl, Thomas]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephane RomeroEquipe Communication Intercellulaire et Infections Microbiennes, Centre de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Biologie (CIRB), Collège de France, Paris, France.
Alessia Quatela
Thomas Bornschlögl
Thomas Bornschlög
Stéphanie Guadagnini
Patricia Bassereau
Guy Tran Van Nhieu
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut Pasteur · FR

Funding

Pathogen-host Interactions that Remodel the CytoskeletonR01AI067949 · NIAID · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI IZARD, TINA · 2006 to 2010
$2.0M
NIAID NIH HHS AI067949NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI067949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Filopodia are thin cell extensions sensing the environment. They play an essential role during cell migration, cell-cell or cell-matrix adhesion, by initiating contacts and conveying signals to the cell cortex. Pathogenic microorganisms can hijack filopodia to invade cells by inducing their retraction towards the cell body. Because their dynamics depend on a discrete number of actin filaments, filopodia provide a model of choice to study elementary events linked to adhesion and downstream signalling. However, the determinants controlling filopodial sensing are not well characterized. In this study, we used beads functionalized with different ligands that triggered filopodial retraction when in contact with filopodia of epithelial cells. With optical tweezers, we were able to measure forces stalling the retraction of a single filopodium. We found that the filopodial stall force depends on the coating of the bead. Stall forces reached 8 pN for beads coated with the β1 integrin ligand Yersinia Invasin, whereas retraction was stopped with a higher force of 15 pN when beads were functionalized with carboxyl groups. In all cases, stall forces increased in relation to the density of ligands contacting filopodial tips and were independent of the optical trap stiffness. Unexpectedly, a discrete and small number of Shigella type three secretion systems induced stall forces of 10 pN. These results suggest that the number of receptor-ligand interactions at the filopodial tip determines the maximal retraction force exerted by filopodia but a discrete number of clustered receptors is sufficient to induce high retraction stall forces.

Indexed as

Bacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsBacterial Secretion SystemsBiomechanical PhenomenaCell AdhesionEpithelial CellsHeLa CellsHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansIntegrin beta1LigandsMicroscopy, ConfocalMicrospheresOptical TweezersProtein BindingPseudopodiaShigellaBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsBacterial Secretion SystemsIntegrin beta1Ligands

Identifiers

PMID22899718
PMCPMC3533388
OpenAlexW2119276722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.