Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22899462›Full record

ArticleCytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology2012

Automatic segmentation and supervised learning-based selection of nuclei in cancer tissue images.

Kaustav Nandy, Prabhakar R Gudla, Ryan Amundsen, Karen J Meaburn, Tom Misteli, Stephen J Lockett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A flexible and robust approach for segmenting cell nuclei from 2D microscopy images using supervised learning and template matching.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2013
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kaustav NandyOptical Microscopy and Analysis Laboratory, Advanced Technology Program, SAIC-Frederick, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland 21702, USA. nandyk@mail.nih.gov
Prabhakar R Gudla
Ryan Amundsen
Karen J Meaburn
Tom Misteli
Stephen J Lockett

Funding

Nuclear Architecture and DiseaseZIABC010309 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI MISTELI, THOMAS A · 2009 to 2025
$39.8M
CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CIntramural NIH HHS ZIA BC010309NCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001E
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis of preferential localization of certain genes within the cell nuclei is emerging as a new technique for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Quantitation requires accurate segmentation of 100-200 cell nuclei in each tissue section to draw a statistically significant result. Thus, for large-scale analysis, manual processing is too time consuming and subjective. Fortuitously, acquired images generally contain many more nuclei than are needed for analysis. Therefore, we developed an integrated workflow that selects, following automatic segmentation, a subpopulation of accurately delineated nuclei for positioning of fluorescence in situ hybridization-labeled genes of interest. Segmentation was performed by a multistage watershed-based algorithm and screening by an artificial neural network-based pattern recognition engine. The performance of the workflow was quantified in terms of the fraction of automatically selected nuclei that were visually confirmed as well segmented and by the boundary accuracy of the well-segmented nuclei relative to a 2D dynamic programming-based reference segmentation method. Application of the method was demonstrated for discriminating normal and cancerous breast tissue sections based on the differential positioning of the HES5 gene. Automatic results agreed with manual analysis in 11 out of 14 cancers, all four normal cases, and all five noncancerous breast disease cases, thus showing the accuracy and robustness of the proposed approach.

Indexed as

Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsAutomation, LaboratoryBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsBreast NeoplasmsCell NucleusCell Nucleus ShapeCytogenetic AnalysisFemaleHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMammary Glands, HumanModels, BiologicalRepressor ProteinsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsHES5 protein, humanRepressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22899462
PMCPMC6362837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.