ArticleCytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology2012
Automatic segmentation and supervised learning-based selection of nuclei in cancer tissue images.
Article in Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- DeepSynth: Three-dimensional nuclear segmentation of biological images using neural networks trained with synthetic data.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Introduction to Digital Image Analysis in Whole-slide Imaging: A White Paper from the Digital Pathology Association.Journal of pathology informatics · 2019Review
- A Methodology for Texture Feature-based Quality Assessment in Nucleus Segmentation of Histopathology Image.Journal of pathology informatics · 2017Article
- Article
- Cell cycle staging of individual cells by fluorescence microscopy.Nature protocols · 2015Article
- FogBank: a single cell segmentation across multiple cell lines and image modalities.BMC bioinformatics · 2014Article
- A flexible and robust approach for segmenting cell nuclei from 2D microscopy images using supervised learning and template matching.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2013Article
- Ranked retrieval of segmented nuclei for objective assessment of cancer gene repositioning.BMC bioinformatics · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Analysis of preferential localization of certain genes within the cell nuclei is emerging as a new technique for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Quantitation requires accurate segmentation of 100-200 cell nuclei in each tissue section to draw a statistically significant result. Thus, for large-scale analysis, manual processing is too time consuming and subjective. Fortuitously, acquired images generally contain many more nuclei than are needed for analysis. Therefore, we developed an integrated workflow that selects, following automatic segmentation, a subpopulation of accurately delineated nuclei for positioning of fluorescence in situ hybridization-labeled genes of interest. Segmentation was performed by a multistage watershed-based algorithm and screening by an artificial neural network-based pattern recognition engine. The performance of the workflow was quantified in terms of the fraction of automatically selected nuclei that were visually confirmed as well segmented and by the boundary accuracy of the well-segmented nuclei relative to a 2D dynamic programming-based reference segmentation method. Application of the method was demonstrated for discriminating normal and cancerous breast tissue sections based on the differential positioning of the HES5 gene. Automatic results agreed with manual analysis in 11 out of 14 cancers, all four normal cases, and all five noncancerous breast disease cases, thus showing the accuracy and robustness of the proposed approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.