Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22899386›Full record

ArticleStem cells (Dayton, Ohio)2012

Remodeling of endogenous mammary epithelium by breast cancer stem cells.

Natesh Parashurama, Neethan A Lobo, Ken Ito, Adriane R Mosley, Frezghi G Habte, Maider Zabala, Bryan R Smith, Jessica Lam, Irving L Weissman, Michael F Clarke and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Engineering molecular imaging strategies for regenerative medicine.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2018
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Breast cancer stem cells.Frontiers in physiology · 2013
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natesh ParashuramaMolecular Imaging Program @Stanford, Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Neethan A Lobo
Ken Ito
Adriane R Mosley
Frezghi G Habte
Maider Zabala
Bryan R Smith
Jessica Lam
Irving L Weissman
Michael F Clarke
Sanjiv S Gambhir
Stanford University · US

Funding

Translational Oncology Research Program (Project-005)P30CA124435 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Melinda L. Telli · 2007 to 2026
$71.4M
Small Animal ImagingP50CA114747 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI RAO, JIANGHONG · 2005 to 2014
$18.2M
Multi-Disciplinary Training Program in Cardiovascular Imaging at StanfordT32EB009035 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Koen Nieman, John M. Pauly · 2008 to 2026
$4.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA124435NCI NIH HHS P50 CA114747NCI NIH HHS P50CA114747NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB009035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poorly regulated tissue remodeling results in increased breast cancer risk, yet how breast cancer stem cells (CSC) participate in remodeling is unknown. We performed in vivo imaging of changes in fluorescent, endogenous duct architecture as a metric for remodeling. First, we quantitatively imaged physiologic remodeling of primary branches of the developing and regenerating mammary tree. To assess CSC-specific remodeling events, we isolated CSC from MMTV-Wnt1 (mouse mammary tumor virus long-term repeat enhancer driving Wnt1 oncogene) breast tumors, a well studied model in which tissue remodeling affects tumorigenesis. We confirm that CSC drive tumorigenesis, suggesting a link between CSC and remodeling. We find that normal, regenerating, and developing gland maintain a specific branching pattern. In contrast, transplantation of CSC results in changes in the branching patterns of endogenous ducts while non-CSC do not. Specifically, in the presence of CSC, we identified an increased number of branches, branch points, ducts which have greater than 40 branches (5/33 for CSC and 0/39 for non-CSC), and histological evidence of increased branching. Moreover, we demonstrate that only CSC implants invade into surrounding stroma with structures similar to developing mammary ducts (nine for CSC and one for non-CSC). Overall, we demonstrate a novel approach for imaging physiologic and pathological remodeling. Furthermore, we identify unique, CSC-specific, remodeling events. Our data suggest that CSC interact with the microenvironment differently than non-CSC, and that this could eventually be a therapeutic approach for targeting CSC.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Transformation, NeoplasticEpitheliumFemaleFluorescent DyesGenes, ReporterGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMammary Neoplasms, ExperimentalMammary Tumor Virus, MouseMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicMicroscopy, Fluorescence, MultiphotonMolecular ImagingFluorescent DyesGreen Fluorescent ProteinsWnt1 ProteinWnt1 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID22899386
PMCPMC4158927
OpenAlexW1950110484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.