Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22899311›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2013

Waking up the sleepers: shared transcriptional pathways in axonal regeneration and neurogenesis.

Giorgia Quadrato, Simone Di Giovanni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The stem cell markerProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Intrinsic mechanisms of neuronal axon regeneration.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  7. Review
  8. An RNA binding protein promotes axonal integrity in peripheral neurons by destabilizing REST.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Axon-soma communication in neuronal injury.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Giorgia QuadratoLaboratory for NeuroRegeneration and Repair, Center for Neurology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tuebingen, Otfried-Mueller Strasse 27, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany. giorgia.quadrato@medizin.uni-tuebingen.de
Simone Di Giovanni

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last several years, relevant progress has been made in our understanding of the transcriptional machinery regulating CNS repair after acute injury, such as following trauma or stroke. In order to survive and functionally reconnect to the synaptic network, injured neurons activate an intrinsic rescue program aimed to increase their plasticity. Perhaps, in the attempt to switch back to a plastic and growth-competent state, post-mitotic neurons wake up and re-express a set of transcription factors that are also critical for the regulation of their younger brothers, the neural stem cells. Here, we review and discuss the transcriptional pathways regulating both axonal regeneration and neurogenesis highlighting the connection between the two. Clarification of their common molecular substrate may help simultaneous targeting of both neurogenesis and axonal regeneration with the hope to enhance functional recovery following CNS injury.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsCentral Nervous SystemGene Expression RegulationHumansMammalsModels, BiologicalNerve RegenerationNeurogenesisNeuronal PlasticityTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID22899311
PMCPMC11113138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.