Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22899176›Full record

ArticleGenetic epidemiology2012

Multivariate phenotype association analysis by marker-set kernel machine regression.

Arnab Maity, Patrick F Sullivan, Jun-Ying Tzeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Unpaired data empowers association tests.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Arnab MaityDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA.
Patrick F Sullivan
Jun-Ying Tzeng

Funding

Statistical Methods for Cancer Clinical TrialsP01CA142538 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KOSOROK, MICHAEL R · 2010 to 2019
$21.3M
Genome-wide Haplotype Association Analysis in Mental DisordersR01MH084022 · NIMH · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI TZENG, JUNG-YING · 2009 to 2011
$1.1M
Replication of Schizophrenia Associations in CATIER01MH074027 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SULLIVAN, PATRICK F · 2006 to 2007
$715k
Statistical Methods for Analysis of High-Dimensional Gene and Environment DataR00ES017744 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI MAITY, ARNAB · 2011 to 2013
$663k
Statistical Methods for Analysis of High-Dimensional Gene and Environment DataK99ES017744 · NIEHS · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI MAITY, ARNAB · 2010 to 2010
$76k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA142538NIEHS NIH HHS K99 ES017744NIEHS NIH HHS R00 ES017744NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074027NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH084022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic studies of complex diseases often collect multiple phenotypes relevant to the disorders. As these phenotypes can be correlated and share common genetic mechanisms, jointly analyzing these traits may bring more power to detect genes influencing individual or multiple phenotypes. Given the advancement brought by the multivariate phenotype approaches and the multimarker kernel machine regression, we construct a multivariate regression based on kernel machine to facilitate the joint evaluation of multimarker effects on multiple phenotypes. The kernel machine serves as a powerful dimension-reduction tool to capture complex effects among markers. The multivariate framework incorporates the potentially correlated multidimensional phenotypic information and accommodates common or different environmental covariates for each trait. We derive the multivariate kernel machine test based on a score-like statistic, and conduct simulations to evaluate the validity and efficacy of the method. We also study the performance of the commonly adapted strategies for kernel machine analysis on multiple phenotypes, including the multiple univariate kernel machine tests with original phenotypes or with their principal components. Our results suggest that none of these approaches has the uniformly best power, and the optimal test depends on the magnitude of the phenotype correlation and the effect patterns. However, the multivariate test retains to be a reasonable approach when the multiple phenotypes have none or mild correlations, and gives the best power once the correlation becomes stronger or when there exist genes that affect more than one phenotype. We illustrate the utility of the multivariate kernel machine method through the Clinical Antipsychotic Trails of Intervention Effectiveness antibody study.

Indexed as

Genetic MarkersModels, GeneticMultivariate AnalysisPhenotypeAntipsychotic AgentsChromosomes, Human, Pair 6Computer SimulationGenome-Wide Association StudyHerpesviridae InfectionsHumansModels, StatisticalPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRegression AnalysisSchizophreniaAntipsychotic AgentsGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID22899176
PMCPMC3703860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.