Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22898541›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2012

Retroviral oncogenes: a historical primer.

Peter K Vogt

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Manipulation of the cell cycle by HIV-1.Biochemical Society transactions · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Can Oncogenic Animal Viruses Pose a Threat to Humans?Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Oncogenic Control of Metabolism.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Malignancy and viral infections in Sub-Saharan Africa: A review.Frontiers in virology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Peter K VogtThe Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA. pkvogt@scripps.edu

Funding

P3K, RETROVIRAL ONCOGENE AND HOMOLOG OF PI 3-KINASER01CA078230 · NCI · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI VOGT, PETER K · 1998 to 2013
$5.6M
Activation of silenced tumor suppressor genes by non-coding RNAR01CA151574 · NCI · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI VOGT, PETER K · 2010 to 2014
$1.9M
The Antisense Transcriptome and the Epigenetics of Cancer.R01CA153124 · NCI · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI VOGT, PETER K · 2010 to 2013
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA078230NCI NIH HHS R01CA078230NCI NIH HHS R01 CA151574NCI NIH HHS R01CA151574NCI NIH HHS R01 CA153124NCI NIH HHS R01CA153124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retroviruses are the original source of oncogenes. The discovery and characterization of these genes was made possible by the introduction of quantitative cell biological and molecular techniques for the study of tumour viruses. Key features of all retroviral oncogenes were first identified in src, the oncogene of Rous sarcoma virus. These include non-involvement in viral replication, coding for a single protein and cellular origin. The MYC, RAS and ERBB oncogenes quickly followed SRC, and these together with PI3K are now recognized as crucial driving forces in human cancer.

Indexed as

Cell Transformation, NeoplasticCell Transformation, ViralHistory, 20th CenturyHumansMedical OncologyMolecular BiologyRetroviridae

Identifiers

PMID22898541
PMCPMC3428493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.