ArticleBMC systems biology2012
Identifying biologically interpretable transcription factor knockout targets by jointly analyzing the transcription factor knockout microarray and the ChIP-chip data.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- regCNN: identifyingComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Identifying piRNA targets on mRNAs in C. elegans using a deep multi-head attention network.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Human IRES Atlas: an integrative platform for studying IRES-driven translational regulation in humans.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2021Article
- Transcription factor regulatory modules provide the molecular mechanisms for functional redundancy observed among transcription factors in yeast.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- YHMI: a web tool to identify histone modifications and histone/chromatin regulators from a gene list in yeast.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018Article
- Article
- Detecting Cooperativity between Transcription Factors Based on Functional Coherence and Similarity of Their Target Gene Sets.PloS one · 2016Article
- Article
- Functional redundancy of transcription factors explains why most binding targets of a transcription factor are not affected when the transcription factor is knocked out.BMC systems biology · 2015Article
- A regulatory similarity measure using the location information of transcription factor binding sites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.BMC systems biology · 2014Article
- Identifying cooperative transcription factors in yeast using multiple data sources.BMC systems biology · 2014Article
- YTRP: a repository for yeast transcriptional regulatory pathways.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2014Article
- Saccharomyces genome database provides new regulation data.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- Identifying functional transcription factor binding sites in yeast by considering their positional preference in the promoters.PloS one · 2013Article
- Inferring functional transcription factor-gene binding pairs by integrating transcription factor binding data with transcription factor knockout data.BMC systems biology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTranscription factor knockout microarrays (TFKMs) provide useful information about gene regulation. By using statistical methods for detecting differentially expressed genes between the gene expression microarray data of the mutant and wild type strains, the TF knockout targets of the knocked-out TF can be identified. However, the identified TF knockout targets may contain a certain amount of false positives due to the experimental noises inherent in the high-throughput microarray technology. Even if the identified TF knockout targets are true, the molecular mechanisms of how a TF regulates its TF knockout targets remain unknown by this kind of statistical approaches.
resultsTo solve these two problems, we developed a method to filter out the false positives in the original TF knockout targets (identified by statistical approaches) so that the biologically interpretable TF knockout targets can be extracted. Our method can further generate experimentally testable hypotheses of the molecular mechanisms of how a TF regulates its biologically interpretable TF knockout targets. The details of our method are as follows. First, a TF binding network was constructed using the ChIP-chip data deposited in the YEASTRACT database. Then for each original TF knockout target, it is said to be biologically interpretable if a path (in the TF binding network) from the knocked-out TF to this target could be identified by our path search algorithm. The identified path explains how the TF may regulate this target either directly by binding to its promoter or indirectly through intermediate TFs. After checking all the original TF knockout targets, the biologically interpretable ones could be extracted and the false positives could be filtered out. We validated the biological significance of our refined (i.e., biologically interpretable) TF knockout targets by assessing their functional enrichment, expression coherence, and the prevalence of protein-protein interactions. Our refined TF knockout targets outperform the original TF knockout targets across all measures.
conclusionsBy jointly analyzing the TFKM and ChIP-chip data, our method can extract the biologically interpretable TF knockout targets by identifying paths (in the TF binding network) from the knocked-out TF to these targets. The identified paths form experimentally testable hypotheses regarding the molecular mechanisms of how a TF may regulate its knockout targets. About seven hundred hypotheses generated by our methods have been experimentally validated in the literature. Our work demonstrates that integrating different data sources is a powerful approach to study complex biological systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.