Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22898413›Full record

Trial reportGastrointestinal endoscopy2012

A prospective comparative study of optical coherence tomography and EUS for tumor staging of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Waku Hatta, Kaname Uno, Tomoyuki Koike, Katsunori Iijima, Naoki Asano, Akira Imatani, Tooru Shimosegawa

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The clinical usefulness of optical coherence tomography during cancer interventions.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of early esophageal squamous neoplasia.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Waku HattaDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Kaname Uno
Tomoyuki Koike
Katsunori Iijima
Naoki Asano
Akira Imatani
Tooru Shimosegawa

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe precise assessment of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (SESCCs) limited to the epithelium (EP) or lamina propria mucosa (LPM), the standard indication for endoscopic resection, is important to ensure good outcomes of endoscopic resection. With regard to tomographic imaging techniques, although the accuracy of EUS is practically insufficient, we previously demonstrated that high-resolution optical coherence tomography (OCT) might enable precise assessment for staging in a noninvasive and real-time manner.

objectiveTo clarify the accuracy of the preoperative staging of SESCCs by using OCT compared with that by using 20-MHz probe-type EUS.

designA prospective study.

settingAn academic medical center. PATIENTS: A total of 123 consecutive patients with 131 SESCCs were enrolled from May 2007 to September 2011.

interventionsA specialist examined the patients, by using both OCT and EUS, recorded a representative still image for each lesion, and reported the staging immediately after each examination. Another blinded investigator reviewed the recorded images and reported the staging independently. The histological staging was confirmed by the resected specimens. Finally, we calculated the accuracy of staging by using OCT and EUS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The accuracy of OCT or EUS for EP/LPM.

resultThe accuracy for EP/LPM by using OCT was significantly higher than that by using EUS (OCT, 94.6%; HF-EUS, 80.6%; P < .05). Interobserver agreement of OCT and EUS was good and moderate, respectively. LIMITATIONS: The small number of patients; a single-center, single-operator, nonrandomized, crossover study.

conclusionsWe prospectively demonstrated that the preoperative staging of SESCC by using OCT was more useful than that by using EUS.

Indexed as

EndosonographyTomography, Optical CoherenceAgedCarcinoma, Squamous CellChi-Square DistributionCross-Over StudiesEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagusFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMucous MembraneNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingObserver Variation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.