Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22897533›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2012

The development and psychometric properties of the Humanitarian Emergency Settings Perceived Needs (HESPER) Scale.

Maya Semrau, Mark van Ommeren, Monica Blagescu, Andre Griekspoor, Louise M Howard, Mark Jordans, Heidi Lempp, Anita Marini, Jon Pedersen, Isabelle Pilotte and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Perceived Needs Among Asylum Seekers in Sweden: A Mixed Methods Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Maya SemrauHealth Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK.
Mark van Ommeren
Monica Blagescu
Andre Griekspoor
Louise M Howard
Mark Jordans
Heidi Lempp
Anita Marini
Jon Pedersen
Isabelle Pilotte
Mike Slade
Graham Thornicroft

Funding

Department of Health NF-SI-0611-10053Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe developed the Humanitarian Emergency Settings Perceived Needs (HESPER) Scale, a valid and reliable scale to rapidly assess perceived needs of populations in humanitarian settings in low- and middle-income countries.

methodsWe generated items through a literature review; reduced the number of items on the basis of a survey with humanitarian experts; pilot-tested the scale in Gaza, Jordan, Sudan, and the United Kingdom; and field-tested it in Haiti, Jordan, and Nepal.

resultsDuring field-testing, intraclass correlation coefficients (absolute agreement) for the total number of unmet needs were 0.998 in Jordan, 0.986 in Haiti, and 0.995 in Nepal (interrater reliability), and 0.961 in Jordan and 0.773 in Nepal (test-retest reliability). Cohen's κ for the 26 individual HESPER items ranged between 0.66 and 1.0 (interrater reliability) and between 0.07 and 1.0 (test-retest reliability) across sites. Most HESPER items correlated as predicted with related questions of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-100 (WHOQOL-100), and participants found items comprehensive and relevant, suggesting criterion (concurrent) validity and content validity.

conclusionsThe HESPER Scale rapidly provides valid and reliable population-based data on perceived needs in humanitarian settings.

Indexed as

AltruismNeeds AssessmentAdultFemaleHaitiHumansMaleMiddle AgedMiddle EastNepalPilot ProjectsPsychometricsRelief WorkSudanSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID22897533
PMCPMC3490649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.