Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22896806›Full record

ReviewACS chemical neuroscience2012

Unparalleled control of neural activity using orthogonal pharmacogenetics.

Mikhail G Shapiro, Shawnalea J Frazier, Henry A Lester

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS chemical neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Principles of designing interpretable optogenetic behavior experiments.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2015
    Review
  5. The problem with value.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2014
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Protein-Protein Interactions as New Targets for Ion Channel Drug Discovery.Austin journal of pharmacology and therapeutics · 2013
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. CREB and neuronal selection for memory trace.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Mikhail G ShapiroMiller Research Institute, Department of Bioengineering, and Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA. mikhails@berkeley.edu
Shawnalea J Frazier
Henry A Lester
California Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Alpha4 Nicotinic Receptor in Addiction: Mouse ModelsR01DA017279 · NIDA · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI LESTER, HENRY A. · 2004 to 2014
$3.5M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA017279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studying the functional architecture of the brain requires technologies to precisely measure and perturb the activity of specific neural cells and circuits in live animals. Substantial progress has been made in recent years to develop and apply such tools. In particular, technologies that provide precise control of activity in genetically defined populations of neurons have enabled the study of causal relationships between and among neural circuit elements and behavioral outputs. Here, we review an important subset of such technologies, in which neurons are genetically engineered to respond to specific chemical ligands that have no interfering pharmacological effect in the central nervous system. A rapidly expanding set of these "orthogonal pharmacogenetic" tools provides a unique combination of genetic specificity, functional diversity, spatiotemporal precision, and potential for multiplexing. We review the main classes of orthogonal pharmacogenetic technologies, including neuroreceptors to control neuronal excitability, systems to control gene transcription and translation, and general constructs to control protein-protein interactions, enzymatic function, and protein stability. We describe the key performance characteristics informing the use of these technologies in the brain, and potential directions for improvement and expansion of the orthogonal pharmacogenetics toolkit to enable more sophisticated systems neuroscience.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainHumansIon ChannelsNeurosciencesPharmacogeneticsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSignal TransductionSynapsesTransgenesIon ChannelsReceptors, G-Protein-Coupled

Identifiers

PMID22896806
PMCPMC3419455
OpenAlexW2007362615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.