ReviewACS chemical neuroscience2012
Genetically engineered fluorescent voltage reporters.
Review in ACS chemical neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unravelling molecular dynamics in living cells: Fluorescent protein biosensors for cell biology.Journal of microscopy · 2025Review
- Nanotechnology and Cancer Bioelectricity: Bridging the Gap Between Biology and Translational Medicine.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Tools to measure membrane potential of neurons.Biomedical journal · 2022Review
- Advances and prospects of rhodopsin-based optogenetics in plant research.Plant physiology · 2021Review
- Real Time Generation of Three Dimensional Patterns for Multiphoton Stimulation.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2021Article
- Absorption and Emission Spectroscopic Investigation of the Thermal Dynamics of the Archaerhodopsin 3 Based Fluorescent Voltage Sensor Archon2.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Functional Characterization of Three-Dimensional Cortical Cultures for In Vitro Modeling of Brain Networks.iScience · 2020Article
- Interrogating Cellular Communication in Cancer with Genetically Encoded Imaging Reporters.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2020Review
- Photocycle Dynamics of the Archaerhodopsin 3 Based Fluorescent Voltage Sensor QuasAr1.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Review
- Absorption and Emission Spectroscopic Investigation of the Thermal Dynamics of the Archaerhodopsin 3 Based Fluorescent Voltage Sensor QuasAr1.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- On the development of optical peripheral nerve interfaces.Neural regeneration research · 2019Review
- Fluorescence Enhancement of a Microbial Rhodopsin via Electronic Reprogramming.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2019Article
- Design Rules for Membrane-Embedded Voltage-Sensing Nanoparticles.Biophysical journal · 2017Article
- Genetically Encoded Voltage Indicators: Opportunities and Challenges.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016Review
- Currents through Hv1 channels deplete protons in their vicinity.The Journal of general physiology · 2016Article
- Optogenetic Monitoring of Synaptic Activity with Genetically Encoded Voltage Indicators.Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2016Review
- Optogenetics: 10 years of microbial opsins in neuroscience.Nature neuroscience · 2015Review
- The evolving capabilities of rhodopsin-based genetically encoded voltage indicators.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2015Review
- Designs and sensing mechanisms of genetically encoded fluorescent voltage indicators.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluorescent membrane voltage indicators that enable optical imaging of neuronal circuit operations in the living mammalian brain are powerful tools for biology and particularly neuroscience. Classical voltage-sensitive dyes, typically low molecular-weight organic compounds, have been in widespread use for decades but are limited by issues related to optical noise, the lack of generally applicable procedures that enable staining of specific cell populations, and difficulties in performing imaging experiments over days and weeks. Genetically encoded voltage indicators (GEVIs) represent a newer alternative that overcomes several of the limitations inherent to classical voltage-sensitive dyes. We critically review the fundamental concepts of this approach, the variety of available probes and their state of development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.