Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22896571›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2012

Characterizing and optimizing poly-L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone membranes for urothelial tissue engineering.

Reetta Sartoneva, Anne-Marie Haaparanta, Tuija Lahdes-Vasama, Bettina Mannerström, Minna Kellomäki, Minna Salomäki, George Sándor, Riitta Seppänen, Susanna Miettinen, Suvi Haimi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Tissue engineering of urethra: Systematic review of recent literature.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Reetta SartonevaInstitute of Biomedical Technology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland. reetta.sartoneva@uta.fi
Anne-Marie Haaparanta
Tuija Lahdes-Vasama
Bettina Mannerström
Minna Kellomäki
Minna Salomäki
George Sándor
Riitta Seppänen
Susanna Miettinen
Suvi Haimi
Tampere University · FITampere University of Applied Sciences · FIFIT Biotech (Finland) · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different synthetic biomaterials such as polylactide (PLA), polycaprolactone and poly-l-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone (PLCL) have been studied for urothelial tissue engineering, with favourable results. The aim of this research was to further optimize the growth surface for human urothelial cells (hUCs) by comparing different PLCL-based membranes: smooth (s) and textured (t) PLCL and knitted PLA mesh with compression-moulded PLCL (cPLCL). The effects of topographical texturing on urothelial cell response and mechanical properties under hydrolysis were studied. The main finding was that both sPLCL and tPLCL supported hUC growth significantly better than cPLCL. Interestingly, tPLCL gave no significant advantage to hUC attachment or proliferation compared with sPLCL. However, during the 14 day assessment period, the majority of cells were viable and maintained phenotype on all the membranes studied. The material characterization exhibited potential mechanical characteristics of sPLCL and tPLCL for urothelial applications. Furthermore, the highest elongation of tPLCL supports the use of this kind of texturing. In conclusion, in light of our cell culture results and mechanical characterization, both sPLCL and tPLCL should be further studied for urothelial tissue engineering.

Indexed as

UrotheliumBiocompatible MaterialsCell AdhesionCell ProliferationCells, CulturedHumansPolyestersSurface PropertiesTissue EngineeringBiocompatible Materialslactide-caprolactone copolymerPolyesterspoly(lactide)

Identifiers

PMID22896571
PMCPMC3481579
OpenAlexW2164162314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.