SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012
Mifepristone for uterine fibroids.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions for heavy menstrual bleeding; overview of Cochrane reviews and network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs) for uterine fibroids.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Medical Therapies for Uterine Fibroids - A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.PloS one · 2016Pooled it
- Herbal preparations for uterine fibroids.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Pharmacological treatment for uterine fibroids.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Review
- Ethnopharmacological insights into uterine fibroids: a review of etiology, and therapeutic potential of natural products.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Uterine fibroids: a narrative review of epidemiology and management, with a focus on uterine artery embolization.Gynecology and pelvic medicine · 2024Review
- Acupuncture combined with mifepristone improves sex hormones and inflammatory factors in patients with uterine fibroids.American journal of translational research · 2023Article
- Review
- The Potential of Transforming Growth Factor-beta Inhibitor and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Inhibitor as Therapeutic Agents for Uterine Leiomyoma.International journal of medical sciences · 2022Article
- Uterine Fibroids (Leiomyomata) and Heavy Menstrual Bleeding.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2022Review
- Molecular and Cellular Insights into the Development of Uterine Fibroids.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- 90 YEARS OF PROGESTERONE: Selective progesterone receptor modulators in gynaecological therapies.Journal of molecular endocrinology · 2020Review
- Uterine fibroids: an update on current and emerging medical treatment options.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2019Review
- Mifepristone inhibits IGF-1 signaling pathway in the treatment of uterine leiomyomas.Drug design, development and therapy · 2019Article
- Linarin prevents LPS‑induced acute lung injury by suppressing oxidative stress and inflammation via inhibition of TXNIP/NLRP3 and NF‑κB pathways.International journal of molecular medicine · 2018Article
- Current medical treatment of uterine fibroids.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2018Review
- A Comprehensive Review of the Pharmacologic Management of Uterine Leiomyoma.BioMed research international · 2018Review
- Is ulipristal acetate the new drug of choice for the medical management of uterine fibroids? Res ipsa loquitur?Women's health (London, England) · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUterine fibroids are the most common benign uterine tumours present in women of reproductive age. Mifepristone (RU-486) competitively binds and inhibits progesterone receptors. Studies have suggested that fibroid growth depends on the sexual steroids. Mifepristone has been shown to decrease fibroid size. This review summarises the effects of mifepristone treatment on fibroids and the associated adverse effects as described in randomised controlled trials.
objectivesTo determine the efficacy and safety of mifepristone for the management of uterine fibroids in pre-menopausal women. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the specialised register of the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility (Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and subfertility Review Group), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 4), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL (to November 2011). We handsearched a number of journals, and searched reference lists, databases of ongoing trials and the Internet. There were no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: Only truly randomised controlled trials of mifepristone versus other forms of medical therapy or placebo in pre-menopausal women with confirmed uterine fibroids were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Four authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. Data were analysed using the Peto odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous data and the weighted mean differences for continuous data, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Meta-analyses were performed using the fixed-effect model. MAIN
resultsThree studies involving 112 participants were included. Comparison interventions included different dosages of mifepristone, placebo and vitamin B tablets. There is evidence that treatment with mifepristone relieves heavy menstrual bleeding compared with placebo (Peto OR 17.84; 95% CI 6.72 to 47.38; 2 RCTs, 77 women, I(2) = 0%). Three studies (Bagaria 2009; Engman 2009; Fiscella 2006) were included in the meta-analysis of this comparison. There was no evidence of an effect of mifepristone on the fibroid volume (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.02; 95% CI -0.38 to 0.41; 99 women). Two studies (Bagaria 2009; Fiscella 2006) were included in the meta-analysis of this comparison. There was no evidence of an effect of mifepristone on uterine volume (mean difference (MD) -77.24; 95% CI -240.62 to 86.14; 72 women). The pooled data suggest an increased adverse event (abnormal endometrial histology) in the mifepristone group compared to placebo (OR 31.65; 95% CI 4.83 to 207.35; 2 RCTs; 54 women; I(2) = 0%). Only one study (Bagaria 2009) reported endometrial hyperplasia at the end of the therapy (12/19 women in the mifepristone group versus 0/16 in the placebo group; OR 55.0; 95% CI 2.86 to 105.67). Engman 2009 found a significantly higher rate of cystic glandular dilatation in women in the mifepristone group (5/8 women biopsied) compared with the placebo group (1/11 women biopsied) (OR 16.67; 95% CI 1.36 to 204.03). One study (Fiscella 2006) suggested significant improvements (P < 0.001) for specific quality of life outcomes. AUTHORS'
conclusionsMifepristone reduced heavy menstrual bleeding and improved fibroid-specific quality of life. However, it was not found to reduce fibroid volume. Further well-designed, adequately powered RCTs are needed before a recommendation can be made on the use of mifepristone for the treatment of uterine fibroids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.