SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012
Antibiotics for treating lower urinary tract infection in children.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Short- versus standard-course antimicrobial therapy for children with urinary tract infection: A meta-analysis.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2025Pooled it
- Antibiotics for treating lower urinary tract infection in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Interventions for covert bacteriuria in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Urinary Tract Infection in Children: An Up-To-Date Study.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Article
- Review
- Effective antimicrobial therapies of urinary tract infections among children in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.Pediatric investigation · 2023Review
- Evaluation of new generation systemic immune-inflammation markers to predict urine culture growth in urinary tract infection in children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Examination of Complementary Medicine for Treating Urinary Tract Infections Among Pregnant Women and Children.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Primary care approach to urinary tract infection in children.Singapore medical journal · 2021Article
- Exploring the Experiences and Information Needs of Parents Caring for a Child With a Urinary Tract Infection: A Qualitative Study.Journal of patient experience · 2021Article
- Impact of Antibiotic Prescribing Patterns on Susceptibilities of Uropathogens in Children below 24 Months Old.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Urinary tract infections in children.Lancet (London, England) · 2020Review
- Appropriateness of Antibiotic Prescriptions for Urinary Tract Infections.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2020Article
- Urinary Tract Infection in Children.Recent patents on inflammation & allergy drug discovery · 2019Article
- Urinary tract infections in children: an overview of diagnosis and management.BMJ paediatrics open · 2019Review
- Antimicrobial Pharmacotherapy Management of Urinary Tract Infections in Pediatric Patients.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2018Review
- Article
- Article
- Antimicrobial Stewardship and Urinary Tract Infections.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUrinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common bacterial infections in infants and children. Lower UTI is the most commonly presenting and in the majority of cases can be easily treated with a course of antibiotic therapy with no further complications. A number of antimicrobials have been used to treat children with lower UTIs; however is it unclear what are the specific benefits and harms of such treatments.
objectivesThis review aims to summarise the benefits and harms of antibiotics for treating lower UTI in children. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Renal Group's Specialised Register (April 2012), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 5), MEDLINE OVID SP (from 1966), and EMBASE OVID SP (from 1988) without language restriction. Date of last search: May 2012. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in which antibiotic therapy was used to treat bacteriologically proven, symptomatic, lower UTI in children aged zero to 18 years in primary and community healthcare settings were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and the results expressed as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). MAIN
resultsSixteen RCTs, analysing 1,116 children were included. Conventional 10-day antibiotic treatment significantly increased the number of children free of persistent bacteriuria compared to single-dose therapy (6 studies, 228 children: RR 2.01, 95%CI 1.06 to 3.80). No heterogeneity was observed. Persistent bacteriuria at the end of treatment was reported in 24% of children receiving single-dose therapy compared to 10% of children who were randomised to 10-day therapy. There were no significant differences between groups for persistent symptoms, recurrence following treatment, or re-infection following treatment. There was insufficient data to analyse the effect of antibiotics on renal parenchymal damage, compliance, development of resistant organisms or adverse events. Despite the inclusion of 16 RCTs, methodological weakness and small sample sizes made it difficult to conclude if any of the included antibiotics or regimens were superior to another. AUTHORS'
conclusionsAlthough antibiotic treatment is effective for children with UTI, there are insufficient data to answer the question of which type of antibiotic or which duration is most effective to treat symptomatic lower UTI. This review found that 10-day antibiotic treatment is more likely to eliminate bacteria from the urine than single-dose treatments. No differences were observed for persistent bacteriuria, recurrence or re-infection between short and long-course antibiotics where the antibiotic differed between groups. This data adds to an existing Cochrane review comparing short and long-course treatment of the same antibiotic who also reported no evidence of difference between short and long-course antibiotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.