Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22895956›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012

Antibiotics for treating lower urinary tract infection in children.

Anita Fitzgerald, Rintaro Mori, Monica Lakhanpaul, Kjell Tullus

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Antibiotics for treating lower urinary tract infection in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  3. Interventions for covert bacteriuria in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Urinary tract infections in children.Lancet (London, England) · 2020
    Review
  14. Appropriateness of Antibiotic Prescriptions for Urinary Tract Infections.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2020
    Article
  15. Urinary Tract Infection in Children.Recent patents on inflammation & allergy drug discovery · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Antimicrobial Pharmacotherapy Management of Urinary Tract Infections in Pediatric Patients.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Antimicrobial Stewardship and Urinary Tract Infections.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Anita FitzgeraldClinical Practice Committee, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand. fitzgerald.anita@gmail.com.
Rintaro Mori
Monica Lakhanpaul
Kjell Tullus
Auckland District Health Board · NZGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBNational Center For Child Health and Development · JPUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common bacterial infections in infants and children. Lower UTI is the most commonly presenting and in the majority of cases can be easily treated with a course of antibiotic therapy with no further complications. A number of antimicrobials have been used to treat children with lower UTIs; however is it unclear what are the specific benefits and harms of such treatments.

objectivesThis review aims to summarise the benefits and harms of antibiotics for treating lower UTI in children. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Renal Group's Specialised Register (April 2012), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 5), MEDLINE OVID SP (from 1966), and EMBASE OVID SP (from 1988) without language restriction. Date of last search: May 2012. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in which antibiotic therapy was used to treat bacteriologically proven, symptomatic, lower UTI in children aged zero to 18 years in primary and community healthcare settings were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and the results expressed as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). MAIN

resultsSixteen RCTs, analysing 1,116 children were included. Conventional 10-day antibiotic treatment significantly increased the number of children free of persistent bacteriuria compared to single-dose therapy (6 studies, 228 children: RR 2.01, 95%CI 1.06 to 3.80). No heterogeneity was observed. Persistent bacteriuria at the end of treatment was reported in 24% of children receiving single-dose therapy compared to 10% of children who were randomised to 10-day therapy. There were no significant differences between groups for persistent symptoms, recurrence following treatment, or re-infection following treatment. There was insufficient data to analyse the effect of antibiotics on renal parenchymal damage, compliance, development of resistant organisms or adverse events. Despite the inclusion of 16 RCTs, methodological weakness and small sample sizes made it difficult to conclude if any of the included antibiotics or regimens were superior to another. AUTHORS'

conclusionsAlthough antibiotic treatment is effective for children with UTI, there are insufficient data to answer the question of which type of antibiotic or which duration is most effective to treat symptomatic lower UTI. This review found that 10-day antibiotic treatment is more likely to eliminate bacteria from the urine than single-dose treatments. No differences were observed for persistent bacteriuria, recurrence or re-infection between short and long-course antibiotics where the antibiotic differed between groups. This data adds to an existing Cochrane review comparing short and long-course treatment of the same antibiotic who also reported no evidence of difference between short and long-course antibiotics.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, UrinaryBacteriuriaChildChild, PreschoolDrug Administration ScheduleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUrinary Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, Urinary

Identifiers

PMID22895956
PMCPMC10549960
OpenAlexW1487036240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.