Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22895940›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012

Exercises for mechanical neck disorders.

Theresa M Kay, Anita Gross, Charles H Goldsmith, Sherrill Rutherford, Sandra Voth, Jan L Hoving, Gert Brønfort, Pasqualina L Santaguida

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03854747 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Investigation of the Effect of Cervical Spinal Stabilization Exercises on Spinal Posture, Cervical Proprioception and Postural Instability in Patients With Parkinson's Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorHacettepe UniversityRan2019 to 2019Enrolled18ConditionsParkinson DiseaseArmscervical spinal stabilization exercise
NCT04242576 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Nociceptive Processing in the Cervical Region Through Action Observation, Laterality Discrimination and Exercise

TypeinterventionalSponsorJosue Fernandez CarneroRan2018 to 2019Enrolled54ConditionsPain, NeckArmsRight Left Judgement, Action Observation, Exercise
NCT06906107 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Validation of a Clinical Prediction Rule to Identify Patients With Neck Pain Likely to Benefit From Cervical Spinal Manipulation: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBaylor UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled160ConditionsNeck Pain Musculoskeletal, Neck Pain Treatment, CervicalgiaArmsCervical Manipulation, Exercise, Mobilization
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Manual therapy and exercise for rotator cuff disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  10. Exercises for mechanical neck disorders.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Age-related cutoffs for cervical movement behaviour to distinguish chronic idiopathic neck pain patients from unimpaired subjects.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2015
    Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Theresa M KayWomen's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada. theresa.m.kay@gmail.com.
Anita Gross
Charles H Goldsmith
Sherrill Rutherford
Sandra Voth
Jan L Hoving
Gert Brønfort
Pasqualina L Santaguida
McMaster University · CANorthwestern Health Sciences University · USPhysiotherapy New Zealand · NZSimon Fraser University · CAUniversity of Amsterdam · NLVancouver Island University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeck disorders are common, disabling and costly. The effectiveness of exercise as a physiotherapy intervention remains unclear.

objectivesTo improve pain, disability, function, patient satisfaction, quality of life and global perceived effect in adults with neck pain. SEARCH

methodsComputerized searches were conducted up to February 2012. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included single therapeutic exercise randomized controlled trials for adults with neck pain with or without cervicogenic headache or radiculopathy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently conducted selection, data extraction, 'Risk of bias' assessment, and clinical relevance. The quality of the body of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Relative risk and standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated.  After judging clinical and statistical heterogeneity, we performed meta-analyses. MAIN

resultsSix of the 21 selected trials had low risk of bias. Moderate quality evidence shows that combined cervical, scapulothoracic stretching and strengthening are beneficial for pain relief post treatment (pooled SMD -0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.60, -0.10) and at intermediate follow-up (pooled SMD -0.31, 95% CI: -0.57, -0.06), and improved function short term and intermediate term (pooled SMD -0.45, 95% CI: -0.72, -0.18) for chronic neck pain. Moderate quality evidence demonstrates patients are very satisfied with their care when treated with therapeutic exercise. Low quality evidence shows exercise is of benefit for pain in the short term and for function up to long-term follow-up for chronic neck pain. Low to moderate quality evidence shows that chronic neck pain does not respond to upper extremity stretching and strengthening or a general exercise program.Low to moderate quality evidence supports self-mobilization, craniocervical endurance and low load cervical-scapular endurance exercises in reducing pain, improving function and global perceived effect in the long term for subacute/chronic cervicogenic headache. Low quality evidence supports neck strengthening exercise in acute cervical radiculopathy for pain relief in the short term. AUTHORS'

conclusionsLow to moderate quality evidence supports the use of specific cervical and scapular stretching and strengthening exercise for chronic neck pain immediately post treatment and intermediate term, and cervicogenic headaches in the long term. Low to moderate evidence suggests no benefit for some upper extremity stretching and strengthening exercises or a general exercise program.  Future trials should consider using an exercise classification system to establish similarity between protocols and adequate sample sizes. Factorial trials would help determine the active treatment agent within a treatment regimen where a standardized representation of dosage is essential. Standardized reporting of adverse events is needed for balancing the likelihood of treatment benefits over potential harms.

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesAcute PainAdultChronic PainFemaleHumansMaleManipulation, ChiropracticNeckNeck PainPain ManagementRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID22895940
OpenAlexW4211013151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.