SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012
Blood pressure lowering efficacy of loop diuretics for primary hypertension.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving blood pressure control through pharmacist interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2014Pooled it
- Specific Transcriptome Changes Associated with Blood Pressure Reduction in Hypertensive Patients After Relaxation Response Training.Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) · 2018Trial
- Advanced Hemodynamic Monitoring Allows Recognition of Early Response Patterns to Diuresis in Congestive Heart Failure Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Diuretics in the treatment of hypertension.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2016Review
- An assessment of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for non-communicable diseases (NCDs): more and higher quality research is required in less developed countries.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Terfestatins B and C, New p-Terphenyl Glycosides Produced by Streptomyces sp. RM-5-8.Organic letters · 2015Article
- Observational
- Anti-hypertensive drugs in children and adolescents.World journal of cardiology · 2014Review
- Retrospective evaluation of adverse drug reactions induced by antihypertensive treatment.Journal of pharmacology & pharmacotherapeutics · 2013Article
- Pharmacokinetic and Dynamic of Furosemide in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients.Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal DialysisArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAntihypertensive drugs from the thiazide diuretic drug class have been shown to reduce mortality and cardiovascular morbidity. Loop diuretics are indicated and used as antihypertensive drugs but a systematic review of their blood pressure lowering efficacy or effectiveness in terms of reducing cardiovascular mortality or morbidity from randomized controlled trial evidence has not been conducted.
objectivesTo determine the dose related decrease in systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure as well as adverse events leading to patient withdrawal and adverse biochemical effects (serum potassium, uric acid, creatinine, glucose and lipids profile) due to loop diuretics versus placebo control in the treatment of patients with primary hypertension. SEARCH
methodsMedline (1946-February 2012), EMBASE (1974-February 2012), CENTRAL (issue 2, 2012) and bibliographic citations were searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Double blind randomized placebo controlled trials of at least 3 weeks duration comparing loop diuretic with a placebo in patients with primary hypertension defined as BP >140/90 mmHg at baseline were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. Weighted mean difference and a fixed effects model were used to combine continuous outcome data. The drop outs due to adverse effects was analysed using relative risk ratio. MAIN
resultsNine trials evaluated the dose-related blood pressure lowering efficacy of five drugs within the loop diuretics class (furosemide 40 to 60mg, cicletanine 100 to 150 mg, piretanide 3 to 6 mg, indacrinone enantiomer -2.5 to -10.0/+80 mg and etozolin 200 mg) in 460 patients with baseline blood pressure of 162/103 mmHg for a mean duration of 8.8 weeks. The best estimate of systolic/diastolic blood pressure lowering efficacy of loop diuretics was -7.9 (-10.5, -5.4) mmHg/ -4.4 (-5.6, -2.8) mmHg . Withdrawals due to adverse effects and serum biochemical changes did not show a significant difference.The 2012 updated search resulted in no additional new trials meeting the minimum inclusion criteria. AUTHORS'
conclusionsBased on the limited number of published RCTs, the systolic/diastolic blood pressure lowering effect of loop diuretics is modest (-8/-4 mmHg) and is likely an overestimate due to the high risk of bias in the included studies. There are no clinically meaningful BP lowering differences between different drugs within the loop diuretic class. The dose ranging effects of loop diuretics could not be evaluated. The review did not provide a good estimate of the incidence of harms associated with loop diuretics because of the short duration of the trials and the lack of reporting of adverse effects in many of the trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.