Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22895921›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012

Corticosteroids for Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Richard A C Hughes, Pieter A van Doorn

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Corticosteroids for Guillain-Barré syndrome.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Intravenous immunoglobulin for Guillain-Barré syndrome.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Guillain-Barré syndrome: a century of progress.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The boy who stopped walking….Sudanese journal of paediatrics · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. New strategies in the management of Guillain-Barré syndrome.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2014
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Richard A C HughesMRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK. rhughes11@btinternet.com.
Pieter A van Doorn
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGuillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute paralysing disease caused by inflammation of the peripheral nerves, which corticosteroids would be expected to benefit.

objectivesTo examine the ability of corticosteroids to hasten recovery and reduce the long-term morbidity from GBS. SEARCH

methodsWe searched The Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register (1 November 2011), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 4), CENTRAL (2011, Issue 4), MEDLINE (January 1966 to October 2011) and EMBASE (January 1980 to October 2011). SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs of any form of corticosteroid or adrenocorticotrophic hormone in GBS. Our primary outcome was change in disability grade on a seven-point scale after four weeks. Secondary outcomes included time from randomisation until recovery of unaided walking, time from randomisation until discontinuation of ventilation (for those ventilated), death, death or disability (inability to walk without aid) after 12 months, relapse, and adverse events. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors extracted the data independently. MAIN

resultsNo new trials were discovered in the new searches in June 2009 or November 2011. Six trials with 587 participants provided data for the primary outcome. According to moderate quality evidence, the disability grade change after four weeks in the corticosteroid groups was not significantly different from that in the control groups, mean difference (MD) 0.36 less improvement (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.16 more to 0.88 less improvement). In four trials of oral corticosteroids with 120 participants in total, there was significantly less improvement after four weeks with corticosteroids than without corticosteroids, MD 0.82 disability grades less improvement (95% CI 0.17 to 1.47). In two trials with a combined total of 467 participants, there was no significant difference, MD 0.17 (95% CI -0.06 to 0.39) of a disability grade more improvement after four weeks with intravenous corticosteroids. According to moderate to high quality evidence, there were no significant differences between the corticosteroid-treated and the control groups in any of the secondary efficacy outcomes. Diabetes was significantly more common and hypertension significantly much less common in the corticosteroid-treated participants. AUTHORS'

conclusionsAccording to moderate quality evidence, corticosteroids given alone do not significantly hasten recovery from GBS or affect the long-term outcome. According to low quality evidence oral corticosteroids delay recovery. Diabetes requiring insulin was significantly more common and hypertension less common with corticosteroids.

Indexed as

Adrenocorticotropic HormoneAdultAnti-Inflammatory AgentsChildGlucocorticoidsGuillain-Barre SyndromeHumansMethylprednisolonePrednisoloneRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdrenocorticotropic HormoneAnti-Inflammatory AgentsGlucocorticoidsMethylprednisolonePrednisolone

Identifiers

PMID22895921
OpenAlexW4238442866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.