Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22895787›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

Rate limit of protein elastic response is tether dependent.

Ronen Berkovich, Rodolfo I Hermans, Ionel Popa, Guillaume Stirnemann, Sergi Garcia-Manyes, Bruce J Berne, Julio M Fernandez

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Modulation of a protein-folding landscape revealed by AFM-based force spectroscopy notwithstanding instrumental limitations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Proteins Breaking Bad: A Free Energy Perspective.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2017
    Article
  15. A HaloTag Anchored Ruler for Week-Long Studies of Protein Dynamics.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. On artifacts in single-molecule force spectroscopy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  18. The elastic free energy of a tandem modular protein under force.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ronen BerkovichDepartment of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Rodolfo I Hermans
Ionel Popa
Guillaume Stirnemann
Sergi Garcia-Manyes
Bruce J Berne
Julio M Fernandez
Columbia University · USUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Single Molecule Studies of Titin ElasticityR01HL061228 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC COLL OF MEDICINE, ROCHESTER · PI FERNANDEZ, JULIO M · 1999 to 2017
$7.4M
Nanomechanics of the extracellular matrixR01HL066030 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC COLL OF MEDICINE, ROCHESTER · PI FERNANDEZ, JULIO M · 2001 to 2013
$5.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS NIH-HL61228NHLBI NIH HHS NIH-HL66030NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL061228NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL066030NIGMS NIH HHS NIH-GM4330
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The elastic restoring force of tissues must be able to operate over the very wide range of loading rates experienced by living organisms. It is surprising that even the fastest events involving animal muscle tissues do not surpass a few hundred hertz. We propose that this limit is set in part by the elastic dynamics of tethered proteins extending and relaxing under a changing load. Here we study the elastic dynamics of tethered proteins using a fast force spectrometer with sub-millisecond time resolution, combined with Brownian and Molecular Dynamics simulations. We show that the act of tethering a polypeptide to an object, an inseparable part of protein elasticity in vivo and in experimental setups, greatly reduces the attempt frequency with which the protein samples its free energy. Indeed, our data shows that a tethered polypeptide can traverse its free-energy landscape with a surprisingly low effective diffusion coefficient D(eff) ~ 1,200 nm(2)/s. By contrast, our Molecular Dynamics simulations show that diffusion of an isolated protein under force occurs at D(eff) ~ 10(8) nm(2)/s. This discrepancy is attributed to the drag force caused by the tethering object. From the physiological time scales of tissue elasticity, we calculate that tethered elastic proteins equilibrate in vivo with D(eff) ~ 10(4)-10(6) nm(2)/s which is two to four orders magnitude smaller than the values measured for untethered proteins in bulk.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiophysicsDiffusionElasticityFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferKineticsMicroscopy, Atomic ForceMolecular Dynamics SimulationMusclesProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID22895787
PMCPMC3437906
OpenAlexW2053837249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.