ArticleBiochemistry2012
A host-guest relationship in bone morphogenetic protein receptor-II defines specificity in ligand-receptor recognition.
Article in Biochemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structural Energy Landscapes and Plasticity of the Microstates of ApoBiochemistry · 2020Article
- Differential modulation of energy landscapes of cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) as a regulatory mechanism for class II CRP-dependent promoters.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2019Article
- N-linked glycosylation of the bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 2 (BMPR2) enhances ligand binding.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2014Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
One of the most intriguing questions confronting the bone morphogenetic protein family is the mechanism of ligand recognition, because there are more ligands than receptors. Crystal structures of two type II receptors, ActR-II and BMPR-II, are essentially identical, and a loop structure (A-loop) has been suggested to play a role in determining ligand specificity. A solution biophysical study showed mutations of several A-loop residues in these two receptors exert different ligand binding effects. Thus, the issues of mechanism of ligand recognition and specificity remain unresolved. We examined effects of mutations of residues Y40, G47, and S107 in BMPR-II. These residues are not identified as being in contact with the ligand in the BMP-7-BMPR-II complex but are found mutated in genetic diseases. They are likely to be useful in identifying their roles in differentiating the various BMP ligands. Spectroscopic probing revealed little mutation-induced structural change in BMPR-II. Ligand binding studies revealed that Y40 plays a significant role in differentiating three distinct ligands; G47 and S107 affect ligand binding to a lesser extent. The role of the A-loop in ActR-II or BMPR-II is dependent on the host sequence of the receptor extracellular domain (ECD) in which it is embedded, suggesting a host-guest relationship between the A-loop and the rest of the ECD. Computational analysis demonstrated a long-range connectivity between Y40, G47, and S107 and other locations in BMPR-II. An integration of these results on functional energetics and protein structures clearly demonstrates, for the first time, an intradomain communication network within BMPR-II.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.