Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22894746›Full record

Trial reportBMC research notes2012

Use of a home-use test to diagnose HIV infection in a sex partner: a case report.

David A Katz, Matthew R Golden, Joanne D Stekler

Open access · goldAbstract readCase ReportsRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC research notes, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Predictors for Using a HIV Self-Test Among Migrant and Seasonal Farmworkers in North Carolina.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2015
    Article
  8. Black men who have sex with men, sexual risk-taking, and willingness to use rapid home HIV tests.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2015
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Arguments for and against HIV self-testing.HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2014
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David A KatzDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. dkatz7@u.washington.edu
Matthew R Golden
Joanne D Stekler
University of Washington · USSeattle University · US

Funding

University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Kenneth Sherr · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
Comparisons of Public Health Screening Methods for Acute and Early HIV InfectionR01MH086360 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STEKLER, JOANNE DONNA · 2009 to 2013
$2.5M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH086360NIMH NIH HHS R01MH086360
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHome-use HIV tests have the potential to increase testing and may be used by sex partners to inform sexual decision-making. To our knowledge, this is the first report of an individual diagnosed with HIV using a home-use test with a sex partner. CASE PRESENTATION: We are conducting a randomized controlled trial of home self-testing for HIV using the OraQuick ADVANCE® HIV-1/2 Antibody Test on oral fluids. In 2011, a 27-year-old, homeless, Latino man who has sex with men not enrolled in the trial (the case) reported receiving a reactive result from a diverted study kit. When interviewed by study staff, the case reported that, 11 months prior, he had unprotected anal sex with a trial subject without discussing HIV status. Afterwards, the subject asked the case if he would like to test, performed the test, and disclosed the reactive result. The case reported altering his behavior to decrease the risk of HIV transmission to subsequent partners and sought care two months later.

conclusionsThis case demonstrates that home-use HIV tests will be used by sex partners to learn and disclose HIV status and inform sexual decision-making. It also highlights concerns regarding the absence of counseling and the potential for delayed entry into HIV care. Additional research must be done to determine under what circumstances home-use tests can be used to increase awareness of HIV status, how they impact linkage to care among persons newly diagnosed with HIV, and whether they can be safely used to increase the accuracy of serosorting.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Self EvaluationHIVHomosexuality, MaleAdultCondomsCounselingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHIV InfectionsHIV SeropositivityHumansMaleSexual BehaviorSexual PartnersUnsafe Sex

Identifiers

PMID22894746
PMCPMC3598546
OpenAlexW1994721036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.