ArticleMedical physics2012
Monte Carlo simulation of a compact microbeam radiotherapy system based on carbon nanotube field emission technology.
Article in Medical physics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Superior Carbon Nanotube Field Emission for X-Ray Source via Metal Silicide-Induced Adhesion.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
- Clinical microbeam radiation therapy with a compact source: specifications of the line-focus X-ray tube.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2020Article
- Microbeam radiation therapy - grid therapy and beyond: a clinical perspective.The British journal of radiology · 2017Review
- A preclinical microbeam facility with a conventional x-ray tube.Medical physics · 2016Article
- Fiber-optic detector for real time dosimetry of a micro-planar x-ray beam.Medical physics · 2015Article
- Effects of high-dose microbeam irradiation on tumor microvascular function and angiogenesis.Radiation research · 2015Article
- Nanotube x-ray for cancer therapy: a compact microbeam radiation therapy system for brain tumor treatment.Expert review of anticancer therapy · 2014Review
- Pilot study for compact microbeam radiation therapy using a carbon nanotube field emission micro-CT scanner.Medical physics · 2014Article
- Studies of a prototype linear stationary x-ray source for tomosynthesis imaging.Physics in medicine and biology · 2014Article
- Image-guided microbeam irradiation to brain tumour bearing mice using a carbon nanotube x-ray source array.Physics in medicine and biology · 2014Article
- Investigating the Dosimetric Characteristics of Microbeam Radiation Treatment.Journal of medical signals and sensorsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMicrobeam radiation therapy (MRT) is an experimental radiotherapy technique that has shown potent antitumor effects with minimal damage to normal tissue in animal studies. This unique form of radiation is currently only produced in a few large synchrotron accelerator research facilities in the world. To promote widespread translational research on this promising treatment technology we have proposed and are in the initial development stages of a compact MRT system that is based on carbon nanotube field emission x-ray technology. We report on a Monte Carlo based feasibility study of the compact MRT system design.
methodsMonte Carlo calculations were performed using EGSnrc-based codes. The proposed small animal research MRT device design includes carbon nanotube cathodes shaped to match the corresponding MRT collimator apertures, a common reflection anode with filter, and a MRT collimator. Each collimator aperture is sized to deliver a beam width ranging from 30 to 200 μm at 18.6 cm source-to-axis distance. Design parameters studied with Monte Carlo include electron energy, cathode design, anode angle, filtration, and collimator design. Calculations were performed for single and multibeam configurations.
resultsIncreasing the energy from 100 kVp to 160 kVp increased the photon fluence through the collimator by a factor of 1.7. Both energies produced a largely uniform fluence along the long dimension of the microbeam, with 5% decreases in intensity near the edges. The isocentric dose rate for 160 kVp was calculated to be 700 Gy∕min∕A in the center of a 3 cm diameter target. Scatter contributions resulting from collimator size were found to produce only small (<7%) changes in the dose rate for field widths greater than 50 μm. Dose vs depth was weakly dependent on filtration material. The peak-to-valley ratio varied from 10 to 100 as the separation between adjacent microbeams varies from 150 to 1000 μm.
conclusionsMonte Carlo simulations demonstrate that the proposed compact MRT system design is capable of delivering a sufficient dose rate and peak-to-valley ratio for small animal MRT studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.