ArticleIRB
The silent majority: who speaks at IRB meetings?
Article in IRB. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evaluating IACUCs: Previous Research and Future Directions.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2020Pooled it
- Institutional Review Board Use of Outside Experts: What Do We Know?Ethics & human research · 2022Review
- Institutional Review Board Assessment-Balancing Efficiency and Quality.Ochsner journal · 2020Review
- Factors Influencing IACUC Decision Making: Who Leads the Discussions?Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2017Article
- Barriers to Effective Deliberation in Clinical Research Oversight.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2016Article
- Those Responsible for Approving Research Studies Have Poor Knowledge of Research Study Design: a Knowledge Assessment of Institutional Review Board Members.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2015Article
- Decision Making and the IACUC: Part 1- Protocol Information Discussed at Full-Committee Reviews.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2015Article
- Redressing past wrongs: changing the common rule to increase minority voices in research.American journal of public health · 2013Article
- The participation of community members on medical institutional review boards.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2012Article
- Reliance agreements and single IRB review of multisite research: Concerns of IRB members and staff.AJOB empirical bioethicsReview
- Reducing the Single IRB Burden: Streamlining Electronic IRB Systems.AJOB empirical bioethicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22893993PMC3673020What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.