Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22893851›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2012

Ash generation and distribution from the April-May 2010 eruption of Eyjafjallajökull, Iceland.

Magnús T Gudmundsson, Thorvaldur Thordarson, Armann Höskuldsson, Gudrún Larsen, Halldór Björnsson, Fred J Prata, Björn Oddsson, Eyjólfur Magnússon, Thórdís Högnadóttir, Guðrún Nína Petersen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Assessing natural global catastrophic risks.Natural hazards (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. High-Precision In SituJournal of analytical methods in chemistry · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Magnús T GudmundssonNordvulk, Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Iceland, Sturlugata 7, 101 Reykjavík, Iceland. mtg@hi.is
Thorvaldur Thordarson
Armann Höskuldsson
Gudrún Larsen
Halldór Björnsson
Fred J Prata
Björn Oddsson
Eyjólfur Magnússon
Thórdís Högnadóttir
Guðrún Nína Petersen
Chris L Hayward
John A Stevenson
Ingibjörg Jónsdóttir

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 39-day long eruption at the summit of Eyjafjallajökull volcano in April-May 2010 was of modest size but ash was widely dispersed. By combining data from ground surveys and remote sensing we show that the erupted material was 4.8±1.2·10¹¹ kg (benmoreite and trachyte, dense rock equivalent volume 0.18±0.05 km³). About 20% was lava and water-transported tephra, 80% was airborne tephra (bulk volume 0.27 km³) transported by 3-10 km high plumes. The airborne tephra was mostly fine ash (diameter <1000 µm). At least 7·10¹⁰ kg (70 Tg) was very fine ash (<28 µm), several times more than previously estimated via satellite retrievals. About 50% of the tephra fell in Iceland with the remainder carried towards south and east, detected over ~7 million km² in Europe and the North Atlantic. Of order 10¹⁰ kg (2%) are considered to have been transported longer than 600-700 km with <10⁸ kg (<0.02%) reaching mainland Europe.

Indexed as

Volcanic EruptionsEuropeGeographyIcelandParticle SizeTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID22893851
PMCPMC3418519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.