Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22893195›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2013

Exploring discordance between biologic and self-reported measures of semen exposure: a qualitative study among female patients attending an STI clinic in Jamaica.

Marion W Carter, Althea Bailey, Margaret C Snead, Elizabeth Costenbader, Malene Townsend, Maurizio Macaluso, Denise J Jamieson, Tina Hylton-Kong, Lee Warner, Markus J Steiner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. PrEP Use Among Female Sex Workers: No Evidence for Risk Compensation.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2019
    Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marion W CarterDivision of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA. acq0@cdc.gov
Althea Bailey
Margaret C Snead
Elizabeth Costenbader
Malene Townsend
Maurizio Macaluso
Denise J Jamieson
Tina Hylton-Kong
Lee Warner
Markus J Steiner

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We explored the use of qualitative interviews to discuss discrepancies between two sources of information on unprotected sex: biomarker results and self-reported survey data. The study context was a randomized trial in Kingston, Jamaica examining the effect of STI counseling messages on recent sexual behavior using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as the primary study outcome. Twenty women were interviewed. Eleven participants were selected because they tested positive for PSA indicating recent semen exposure, yet reported no unprotected sex in a quantitative survey ("discordant"): 5 reported abstinence and 6 reported condom use. Nine participants who also tested positive for PSA but reported unprotected sex in the survey were interviewed for comparison ("concordant"). Qualitative interviews with 6 of the 11 discordant participants provided possible explanations for their PSA test results, and 5 of those were prompted by direct discussion of those results. Rapid PSA testing combined with qualitative interviews provides a novel tool for investigating and complementing self-reported sexual behavior.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBiomarkersCondomsFemaleHumansJamaicaMaleMiddle AgedProstate-Specific AntigenQualitative ResearchRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelf ReportSemenSexual AbstinenceSexually Transmitted DiseasesBiomarkersProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID22893195
PMCPMC4544859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.